BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Help for O.G. 38

Expert replies
by yvonne0923 » Fri May 27, 2011 2:58 pm
Which of the following best completes the passage below?

The computer industry's estimate that it loses millions of dollars when users illegally copy programs without paying for them is greatly exaggerated. Most of the illegal copying is done by people with no serious interest in the programs. Thus, the loss to the industry is quite small, because _________.


(A) many users who illegally copy programs never find any use for them
(B) most people who illegally copy programs would not purchase them even if purchasing them were the only way to obtain them
(C) even if the computer industry received all the revenue it claims to be losing, it would still be experiencing financial difficulties
(D) the total market value of all illegal copies is low in comparison to the total revenue of the computer industry
(E) the number of programs that are frequently copied illegally is low in comparison to the number of programs available for sale







___________________________________________________________________________________________________

I am confusing with the explanation at the back of the O.G book, according to the explanation "the industry's loss due to illegal copying of programs must be evaluated in terms of the sales lost;", what kind of situation is this, can you make a more specific example to explain this? Since from my point of view, illegal copying will make the loss of industry, no matter if these people who illegally copying these programs are interested in them or not.

Can anyone explain?

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cans » Fri May 27, 2011 4:43 pm
Is the OA B??
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Fri May 27, 2011 6:26 pm
cans wrote:Is the OA B??
Yeah, but why B?
according to the explanation "the industry's loss due to illegal copying of programs must be evaluated in terms of the sales lost;", what kind of situation is this, can you make a more specific example to explain this? Since from my point of view, illegal copying will make the loss of industry, no matter if these people who illegally copying these programs are interested in them or not.
Join the discussion

by cans » Fri May 27, 2011 9:10 pm
the industry's loss due to illegal copying of programs must be evaluated in terms of the sales lost
Why illegal copying of programs will lead to losses?
Ans - Because if people can have programs for free, they won't buy them. Thus Illegal copies affect the sales.
Now option B is (B) most people who illegally copy programs would not purchase them even if purchasing them were the only way to obtain them
Thus even if only original programs were available, sales will increase only by a small amount and thus loss due to illegal copies is quite small.


Ex - Suppose we have a calculator s/w by company ABC available with price $40 in the market.
ABC company estimates that if 1000 people get access to illegal copy, loss will be $40,000 (because these people wont buy and thus loss in sales..)
But if we know that of the 1000 people, 900 people wont buy the s/w at any cost, it means if there were only original copies available, only 100 (=1000-900) people will buy the s/w and thus loss = $4000, instead of $40,000. ($4000 is relatively small as compared to $40,000)

I hope you get it.. If you have any further doubt, you can ask again..
Join the discussion

by akshatmikku » Sat May 28, 2011 3:30 am
So here is my explanation for this question -
B says most people who illegally download are not gonna buy your program anyways , so from the question stem if these guys go ahead and illegally copy programs without paying for it , it doesn't really make much of a difference to the company's sales and hence losses will be minimized
So ans is B -
Further analysis of the question -( no need for this !)
( "MOST people" implies that company will still incur some loss)
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Sat May 28, 2011 12:55 pm
cans wrote:
the industry's loss due to illegal copying of programs must be evaluated in terms of the sales lost
Why illegal copying of programs will lead to losses?
Ans - Because if people can have programs for free, they won't buy them. Thus Illegal copies affect the sales.
Now option B is (B) most people who illegally copy programs would not purchase them even if purchasing them were the only way to obtain them
Thus even if only original programs were available, sales will increase only by a small amount and thus loss due to illegal copies is quite small.


Ex - Suppose we have a calculator s/w by company ABC available with price $40 in the market.
ABC company estimates that if 1000 people get access to illegal copy, loss will be $40,000 (because these people wont buy and thus loss in sales..)
But if we know that of the 1000 people, 900 people wont buy the s/w at any cost, it means if there were only original copies available, only 100 (=1000-900) people will buy the s/w and thus loss = $4000, instead of $40,000. ($4000 is relatively small as compared to $40,000)

I hope you get it.. If you have any further doubt, you can ask again..
Thanks. But I just want to make sure if I understand this correctly.
In the second case you mentioned,
But if we know that of the 1000 people, 900 people wont buy the s/w at any cost, it means if there were only original copies available, only 100 (=1000-900) people will buy the s/w and thus loss = $4000, instead of $40,000. ($4000 is relatively small as compared to $40,000)
it means these 900 people will not have any other ways to obtain the calculators if they won't purchase them. According to the O.G. problem, most people who won't purchase the program will not able to copy it neither (since it states that ...even if purchasing them were the only way to obtain them ). In this case, the loss will be relatively small.
Am I on the right track?
Join the discussion

by cans » Sat May 28, 2011 8:17 pm
Yup :)
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Sat May 28, 2011 8:56 pm
cans wrote:Yup :)
Thank for your post!
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Sat May 28, 2011 10:06 pm
Thanks for the explanation Cans.
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Sat May 28, 2011 10:07 pm
Thanks for the explanation Cans.
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion