BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

hard question from good source

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by thephoenix » Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:22 am
imo e
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:46 am
duongthang wrote:Pls, tell me how to solve quick

is xy>0?
1, x-y>2
2, x-2y<-6
This question is testing your knowledge of how positive and negative numbers behave.
First recognize that if xy>0 then x and y must be either both positive or both negative.
So, the question can be rewritten as "Do x and y have the same sign?" (both pos or both neg).

1) We can rewrite this as y+2 < x
Aside: I always rewrite my inequalities so that the greater value is on the right. Then the values are listed in ascendiing order.
Notice that, since we also know that y < y+2, we can add this to the inequality above to get: y < y+2 < x
From here we can see that x is greater than y.
This is not enough information to answer our question.

2) We can rewrite this as x < 2y-6
We can see that this isn't enough to answer our question (y could be positive and x could be negative, or they both could be positive)

(1&2)
We can combine both inequalities to get: y < y+2 < x < 2y-6
From this, we can conclude that y < 2y-6
From here we know that y must be positive. If y were negative, it would be impossible for 2y-6 to be greater than y.
Proof: Assume that y is negative and notice that this leads us to a contradiction. First, if y is negative, then 2y<y. And since 2y-6 < 2y, we would have to conclude that 2y-6 < 2y < y. In other words, it would have to be true that 2y-6 < y.
Our inequality y < y+2 < x < 2y-6 tells us the opposite is true.
So, y must be positive.
From statement (1), we know that y<x, so x must also be positive.
If x and y are both positive, we can answer our question.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:51 pm
Brent you make deriving the answer look so simple! I guess it is once you put it like that haha... I'm hoping to pick up the skills like there, because as I was reading your explanation I wasn't nervous about understand it. I'm beginning to find myself getting nervous about this exam when I don't understand the explanations to problems.
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:52 am
Brent Hanneson wrote:[
From this, we can conclude that y < 2y-6
From here we know that y must be positive. If y were negative, it would be impossible for 2y-6 to be greater than y.
Proof: Assume that y is negative and notice that this leads us to a contradiction. First, if y is negative, then 2y<y. And since 2y-6 < 2y, we would have to conclude that 2y-6 < 2y < y. In other words, it would have to be true that 2y-6 < y.
Our inequality y < y+2 < x < 2y-6 tells us the opposite is true.
So, y must be positive.
Alternatively:

y < 2y - 6

(subtract y from both sides)

0 < y - 6

(add 6 to both sides)

6 < y

therefore y is positive

:D
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:40 pm
even easier!
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:04 pm
x > y + 2 --> (1)
x < 2y - 6 --> (2)

Multiply 2nd equation by -1, we get:

-x > 6 - 2y --> (3)
x > y + 2 --> (4)

Adding (3) & (4), we get:

0 > 8 - y
y > 8
x > y +2 > 10

Hence, xy > 0 . Ans is C.
Join the discussion