BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gud prob

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:19 am
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:25 am
how cm A
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:27 am
OA is A. Pls explain..X> y+z
and this holds true if no. are +ve
wt abt -ve no.
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:31 am
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:OA is A. Pls explain..X> y+z
and this holds true if no. are +ve
wt abt -ve no.
You are given in the question X, Y and Z are positive integers, :)
Join the discussion

by namitrajiv » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:45 am
hI stop@800,
Can you kindly prove, hows b insufficient ,
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:53 am
namitrajiv wrote:hI stop@800,
Can you kindly prove, hows b insufficient ,
x – y – z > 0

x > z + y

y is positive
so if x is greater than z+y, it will certainly be greater than z-y as we are subtracting something [2y] positive.

so
B is sufficient

Example:

100 > 50

100 will always be greater than 50-x
where x is positive integer

Hope this helps!!!
Join the discussion

by namitrajiv » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:56 am
In case B is sufficient then answer must be D
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:12 am
namitrajiv wrote:In case B is sufficient then answer must be D
Buddy, I justified A
and A is the answer.

I assumed that you wanted me to explain A and you wrote B by mistake.
Join the discussion

by namitrajiv » Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:23 am
no actually I wanted to knw hw B is insufficient,

i.e z^2 = x^2+y^2 ,
it seems to me this is sufficient to prove that
x>z-y

e.g z= 13, y = 12, x =5
z= 13 , y = 12, x = 5

I cant find a case where the condition is insufficient
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:44 am
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:26 am
stop@800 wrote:36, 77, 85
z^2 = x^2+y^2
85^2 = 36^2 + 77^2
36>85-77
77>85-36
x>z-y
So B suff with D as answer

I agree with A but your example made me unsure
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:01 am
stop@800 explained well above why the first statement is sufficient.

The second statement is also sufficient. If we know that x, y and z are positive, and that the Pythagorean relationship holds:

x^2 + y^2 = z^2

then we know that we can make a right angled triangle with sides x, y and z, where z is the hypotenuse. And in any triangle, the sum of two sides is always larger than the third side:

x + y > z
x > z - y

So the answer should be D.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:12 am
Hi Ian,

in GMATLAND, ain't 0 a positive integer?

Also, the question stem does not say X Y Z are all different.

how can phythagoras be used then?
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:56 pm
cubicle_bound_misfit wrote:Hi Ian,

in GMATLAND, ain't 0 a positive integer?

Also, the question stem does not say X Y Z are all different.

how can phythagoras be used then?
No, 0 is not a positive integer. It is an integer, but it isn't positive, and it isn't negative.

If you have two lines of length x and y, and you connect them at right angles, the hypotenuse z will automatically satisfy

x^2 + y^2 = z^2

That's Pythagoras. It doesn't matter if x and y are different or equal. So you can make a triangle with sides x, y and z, and x+y must be greater than z.

(and while it's not especially important, in this question, x actually must be different from y if the second statement is true, because we know x, y and z are all integers -- if x were an integer and equal to y, then z would need to be equal to root(2)*x, which wouldn't be an integer).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion