Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

golden question

Expert replies
by kiranlegend » Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:38 am
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s
Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported,
Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there.
Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods
used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was
in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of
Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by
Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for
gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples
were examined.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:21 am
IMO;E


I know the assumption is quite funny... :wink: but i guess thats d only one that makes sense..
Join the discussion

by agent47 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:08 am
dont have solid reason but IMO C
Join the discussion

by reachac » Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:47 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:31 pm
my pick is E as well. By using deinial test, if Gold was added before the sample test, then the "methods" used to find the gold are indeed accurate and the evidence that mining didnt help find any gold is also substantiated at the same time.
Join the discussion

Re: golden question

by nitin86 » Fri Jul 25, 2008 7:39 pm
kiranlegend wrote:Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s
Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported,
Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there.
Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods
used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was
in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of
Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by
Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for
gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples
were examined.
IMO E

The problem with D is -> If we use negation test ..i.e "Frobisher HAD soil samples from other Canadian islands..for gold content...",

1) argument does not specify whether or not those islands ACTUALLY had gold content...those islands might or might not had gold content...
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:29 am
I prefer C to E,
E seems have no relevance to passage.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by tolmar » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:40 am
Also E.

the passage doesn't say anything that the other mining expenditures. they could be done by Frobisher or by others with other methods.

since we don't know this for sure, I'll go with E.
Join the discussion

by jsl » Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:41 am
ildude02 wrote:By using deinial test
Hi ildude02 - please can you explain how you use the denial test? I'm struggling with strengthen/assumption questions and I reckon this test would help me. What is it and how do I use the test?
Join the discussion

by Hunsi » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:43 pm
Can you post the right answer and what prep material is this from.

I think it would be E as C Seems ti general/Vague.
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 2:43 am
It seems to me that the right answer is E
Join the discussion