BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

golden question

Expert replies
by kiranlegend » Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:38 am
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s
Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported,
Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there.
Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods
used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was
in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of
Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by
Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for
gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples
were examined.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:21 am
IMO;E


I know the assumption is quite funny... :wink: but i guess thats d only one that makes sense..
Join the discussion

by agent47 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:08 am
dont have solid reason but IMO C
Join the discussion

by reachac » Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:47 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:31 pm
my pick is E as well. By using deinial test, if Gold was added before the sample test, then the "methods" used to find the gold are indeed accurate and the evidence that mining didnt help find any gold is also substantiated at the same time.
Join the discussion

Re: golden question

by nitin86 » Fri Jul 25, 2008 7:39 pm
kiranlegend wrote:Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s
Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported,
Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there.
Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods
used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was
in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of
Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by
Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for
gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples
were examined.
IMO E

The problem with D is -> If we use negation test ..i.e "Frobisher HAD soil samples from other Canadian islands..for gold content...",

1) argument does not specify whether or not those islands ACTUALLY had gold content...those islands might or might not had gold content...
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:29 am
I prefer C to E,
E seems have no relevance to passage.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by tolmar » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:40 am
Also E.

the passage doesn't say anything that the other mining expenditures. they could be done by Frobisher or by others with other methods.

since we don't know this for sure, I'll go with E.
Join the discussion

by jsl » Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:41 am
ildude02 wrote:By using deinial test
Hi ildude02 - please can you explain how you use the denial test? I'm struggling with strengthen/assumption questions and I reckon this test would help me. What is it and how do I use the test?
Join the discussion

by Hunsi » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:43 pm
Can you post the right answer and what prep material is this from.

I think it would be E as C Seems ti general/Vague.
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 2:43 am
It seems to me that the right answer is E
Join the discussion