BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrer Test 1 problem - Number Theory

Expert replies
by medenica » Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm
"The number 75 can be written as the sum of the squares of 3 different positive integers. What is the sum of these 3 integers."

How do you go about these problems? Even with the correct answer I don't quite see how to attack these. Anyone know?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Argen » Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:17 am
Can you tell me the answer?
Join the discussion

by medenica » Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:25 am
According to GMATPrep, the answer is 13.
Join the discussion

by Argen » Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:42 am
I think there is a generalized way to solve this kind of problem using spherical coordinates and trigonometry, but 75 is a small number, here's how I would solve it just by doing trial and error:

First we can write 75 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2

Then we can see that 0<a<b<c<9. So we only need to consider possible sums of 8 perfect squares. We'll start guessing what c is because then it'll be easier to guess the sum of a and b. We start with c=8, and a^2+b^2=75-64=11, which is not possible. Then we try 7. a^2+b^2=75-49=26. Now it's easy to see that a=1 and b=5.

It's not a generalized solution but I hope it helps.
Join the discussion

by GMAT dreamer » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:04 pm
75 is multiple of 5, os square of 5= 25,
25 - 75 = 50; we know that square of 7= 49, rest 1, so square of 1=1

5 + 7 + 1 =13.

The trick is known the multiple of 75, then you can figure out the rest.
Join the discussion

by earth@work » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:56 pm
GMAT dreamer wrote:75 is multiple of 5, os square of 5= 25,
25 - 75 = 50; we know that square of 7= 49, rest 1, so square of 1=1

5 + 7 + 1 =13.

The trick is known the multiple of 75, then you can figure out the rest.
liked this method, then i tried solving other numbers as well but somehow was not able to solve using this method: like took 29 (=16+9+4). cud anybody help me solve 29 using this shortcut method?
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:50 pm
29 being prime would have only 2 factors 1 and 29 so I dont think the methid posted above can be applied here.

Sometimes its just easier to write out the squares and figure it out(as long as its not a huge number).
Join the discussion

by earth@work » Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:24 am
i guess so :-) thanks cramya
Join the discussion