BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep

Expert replies
by madhavi » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:17 am
[url=https://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aVvIpCi][img]https://www.postimage.org/aVvIpCi.jpg[/img][/url]



[url=https://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aVvIC50][img]https://www.postimage.org/aVvIC50.jpg[/img][/url]



[url=https://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1KOxzi][img]https://www.postimage.org/Pq1KOxzi.jpg[/img][/url]

For the first one I feel d can maximum take a value 6. So the info would not help.

2. whether r is -ve or +ve as long as p=r one can conclude. Why is the second condition needed?
[/img]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by madhavi » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:25 am
The attachments are here... Could not embed the images :(
Attachments
1.JPG
3.JPG
4.JPG
Join the discussion

by camitava » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:53 am
madhavi, ur first Qs -
500 is the multiple of 100 closet to x -> Can be x = 451 or 499
400 is the multiple of 100 closet to y -> Can be y = 351 or 399
So x + y = 451 + 399 = 850 = Closet to 900
or = 451 + 351 = 802 = closet to 800

So E is the best option to chose.
Ur second qs -
To me, its coming as A which I think u have also chosen. Don't getting why C is the OA(If it is ...)?

Ur third qs -
f = 30! - right?
Now by stmt - 1 10^d is a factor of f. But d can be 1, 2, 3 or so.
But in stmt - 2, it is saying that d > 6.
Here we can get the value of d and that is 7.
Now question is - how? Look, 30! = product of first 30 integers
For 10, 20 and 30 there will be 3 zeroes coming at the end. Now for every 5 at the unit digit, the product will be zeroes at the unit or ten digit. It will be like - 25 x 4, 15 x 2 and 6 x 5. In (25 x 4), we are getting 2 zeroes for the rest, only 1 zero at the end. So number of zeros that can come in 30! is (3 [For 10,20 and 30] + 2 [25 * 4] + 1 [15 * 2] + 1 [6 * 5] ) = 7.
So d = 7. Am i clear to explain?
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by sujaysolanki » Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:20 am
Nice explantions camitava

Lets chk the one lft out ...

From 1 p = r

Let say p = 2 ---- case 1

1/2 > 2/6 ..Yes

Let say p = -2 ---- case 2

-1/2 > -1/3 No

hence Insufficient


From 2 r > 0 so case 2 above is eliminated ..and also p =r so only case 1 holds

hence C

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by camitava » Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:25 am
Thanks sujaysolanki! Again a miss from my side... I misunderstood the problem at all. God where are you? Pls help meeeeeeeeeeeee ... :wink: :lol:
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by madhavi » Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:29 am
Yeah... that's clear.
Thanks camitava & sujay!
Join the discussion