BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

GMATprep question

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:09 pm
Thanked: 1 times
by princessss » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:40 pm
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1, is 1/k>0?

(1) 1/(k-1)>0

(2) 1/(k+1)>0


My question is why B isn't correct.
If k is not 0,1 or -1 it can be 2,3 ... and it can be -2,-3 etc.
If we say that k is 2 than 1/(2+1) > 0 true
But, since it can't be -1 if k is negative the fraction can be >0. Doesn't that make B sufficient? K must be positive?
The correct answer is A.
Please help
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:51 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by jeetu_vishnoi » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:25 pm
In these type of question you can only select a given condition as true iff it is always true. If there is even a single condition in which it can be false then you can not choose this condition as sufficient.

In the given question you can see that in the first condition, required number will always be positive but in second condition there are possibilities of number being -ve hence answer is A.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pmFollowed by: 255 members
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:47 pm
Hey Princessss,

Great question - and the big key here is that:

k does not have to be an integer.

So, for statement 2, k could be -1/2 and the statement would still hold: 1/(-.5 + 1) = 1/.5 = 2, which is greater than 0.

For integers, statement 2 guarantees a positive numbers (since 0 is not possible as per the rules in teh question stem), but for a noninteger we can still get the answer "NO" to the overall question, and therefore statement 2 is not sufficient.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:01 pm
princessss wrote:If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1, is 1/k>0?

(1) 1/(k-1)>0

(2) 1/(k+1)>0


My question is why B isn't correct.
If k is not 0,1 or -1 it can be 2,3 ... and it can be -2,-3 etc.
If we say that k is 2 than 1/(2+1) > 0 true
But, since it can't be -1 if k is negative the fraction can be >0. Doesn't that make B sufficient? K must be positive?
The correct answer is A.
Please help
In order for 1/k to be positive, k must be positive. Rewritten, the question is asking:

Is k>0?

Statement 1:
In order for 1/(k-1) to be positive, k-1 must be positive. Rewritten, statement 1 tells us:
k-1>0
k>1
Thus, k>0. Sufficient.

Statement 2:
In order for 1/(k+1) to be positive, k+1 must be positive. Rewritten, statement 2 tells us:
k+1>0
k>-1
Thus, k could be negative (k= -1/2, for example), or k could be positive (k=1, for example). Insufficient.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: Gwalior, India
Thanked: 31 times

by goyalsau » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:23 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Statement 1:
In order for 1/(k-1) to be positive, k-1 must be positive. Rewritten, statement 1 tells us:
k-1>0
k>1
Thus, k>0. Sufficient.

Statement 2:
In order for 1/(k+1) to be positive, k+1 must be positive. Rewritten, statement 2 tells us:
k+1>0
k>-1
Thus, k could be negative (k= -1/2, for example), or k could be positive (k=1, for example). Insufficient.

The correct answer is A.
How can you rewrite statements like this,
As per i know we can't do anything with inequalities unless we don't know whether they are positive or negative........
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:29 am
goyalsau wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Statement 1:
In order for 1/(k-1) to be positive, k-1 must be positive. Rewritten, statement 1 tells us:
k-1>0
k>1
Thus, k>0. Sufficient.

Statement 2:
In order for 1/(k+1) to be positive, k+1 must be positive. Rewritten, statement 2 tells us:
k+1>0
k>-1
Thus, k could be negative (k= -1/2, for example), or k could be positive (k=1, for example). Insufficient.

The correct answer is A.
How can you rewrite statements like this,
As per i know we can't do anything with inequalities unless we don't know whether they are positive or negative........
Statement 1 tells us that 1/(k-1)>0. In other words, 1/(k-1) is positive. Since the numerator of this fraction (1) is positive, the denominator (k-1) must also be positive; otherwise, the fraction will take on a negative value. Thus, rewritten, statement 1 tells us that k-1>0.

Does this clarify how I was able to rewrite the two statements?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1