BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmatprep question

Expert replies
by tanviet » Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:16 am
k and l cut each other at the point (4,3), is the products of their slope is nagative

1, product of their x-intercepts is positive

2, product of their y-intercepts is negative
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by girish3131 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:46 am
Good ques...

acc to me .. Ans is E

plz specify OA

ta
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:49 am
IMO E .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:28 pm
how to get answer. I do not have oa
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:50 am
I think OA is C

we know that y = mx + c

for line L : y = m1x + c1
for line M : y = m2x + c2

What we need to know is m1m2<0 ?

1) x intercept = -c/m ( Just put y = 0 and solve)

(-c1/m1)(-c2/m2) > 0

Insufficient
2)c1*c2<0 insufficient

C) Combining inequalities in 1) and 2)

m1m2<0

Thus answer should be C
Join the discussion

by kstv » Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:23 pm
The lines intersect at (4,3) so the lines are in the I st Quadrant
The slope of a line is = y intercept/x intercept
Let us asssume for line 1 the x and y intercept are x1, y1 and line 2 x2,y2
given x1*x2 is +ve and y1*y2 is +ve taking 1 & 2 together
so either x1 and x2 are both +ve or both -ve same for y1 and y2
but since they both pass through (4,3) they have to be +ve and product of slope is +ve

x1*x2 is +ve Given in Q stem 1 and we do not consider that y1*y2 is +ve
y1*y2 can be + or - already discussed when it is +ve
if it is -ve y1 & y2 have diff signs say y1 is +ve y2 is -ve
slope of 1st line y1/x1 both are +ve so slope is +ve slope of 2nd line y2/x2 y2 is -ve
so product of their slope is -ve
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:35 am
there are three scenarios at which the 2 lines will intersect the x and y axis after passing through pt P
-line can intersect each axis at (+,+). in this case the slope is negative
-line can intersect each axis at (-,+) or (+,-). in both the cases the slope will be positive
- (-,-) is not possible bcz line passed thr pt (4,3)

opt 1: product of their x-intercepts is positive

in this case the 2 lines can intersect the x and y axis at
- (+,+) and (+,+) => products of their slope will be positive
- (+,+) and (+,-) => products of their slope will be negative

insufficient


opt 2:, product of their y-intercepts is negative
- (+,+) and (+,-) => products of their slope will be negative
- (-,+) and (+,-) => products of their slope will be positive

insufficient

opt 1 and opt 2 combined
(+,+) and (+,-) => products of their slope will be negative

hence C
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 pm
thank you outstreach

your solution is comprehensive
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:16 am
duongthang wrote:k and l cut each other at the point (4,3), is the products of their slope is nagative

1, product of their x-intercepts is positive

2, product of their y-intercepts is negative
i don't think the point really matters here.

we know that the slope is y-intercept/X-intercept.

We need to find out if (y1/x1) * (y2 /X2) or ( y1*y2) / (x1*x2) is negative.

Statement 1 says (x1 * x2) is +ve. We don't know what is the sign of (y1 * y2), so we can't say that ( y1*y2) / (x1*x2) will be -ve.

Hence, insufficient.


Statement 2 says (y1 * y2) is -ve. We don't know what is the sign of (x1 * x2), so we can't say that ( y1*y2) / (x1*x2) will be -ve.

Hence, insufficient.

But, combining these two statements we can definitely say that ( y1*y2) / (x1*x2) will be -ve.


Hence, IMO C.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion