BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep question

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by jayhawk2001 » Tue May 29, 2007 9:10 pm
Cut-n-pasting from one of my earlier replies...

With these kinds of questions, it is always useful to find the boundaries

We have 3 equations giving us 3 boundaries --

1/x = x^2 implies x = 1
1/x = 2x implies x = 0.7 approx
2x = x^2 implies x = 2

Our 3 boundaries are 0.7, 1 and 2

Take 1 sample for each range

For x<0.7, try x = 0.5
We have x^2 < 2x < 1/x ... bingo, you have (I) satisfied

For x>0.7 and <1, try x = 0.8
we have x^2 < 1/x < 2x ... bingo, you have (II) satisfied

It is easy to see that for all values x > 1, 1/x will give you the
least of the 3. So, (III) can never be true.

So, choose D (i.e. I and II alone)
Join the discussion

by 800GMAT » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:31 pm
Thnkx jayhawk..

D is the OA
Join the discussion

by thumpin_termis » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:28 pm
Great stuff. This brings up an additional question.

When looking for boundaries, it seems that even more can be found. Using couple of the above boundaries for example,

1/x = 2x
would imply
x^2 = 1/2, so x= positive and negative 0.7

and
2x = x^2
x^2 - 2x = 0
x(x-2) = 0
x = 2 and x=0

At this point, I have too many boundaries to test. Am I doing something incorrectly?
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:39 pm
thumpin_termis wrote:Great stuff. This brings up an additional question.

When looking for boundaries, it seems that even more can be found. Using couple of the above boundaries for example,

1/x = 2x
would imply
x^2 = 1/2, so x= positive and negative 0.7

and
2x = x^2
x^2 - 2x = 0
x(x-2) = 0
x = 2 and x=0

At this point, I have too many boundaries to test. Am I doing something incorrectly?
We are given that x is positive, so -0.7 is automatically out.

Also by virtue of x being positive, our lower-limit automatically
starts at 0. So, knowing one of our boundaries is 0.7, we will
have to choose something between 0 and 0.7. So, technically
no additional boundaries ;-)
Join the discussion

by thumpin_termis » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:19 am
Ah-hah. Another reminder to read the question carefully :oops:

Thanks a bunch!
Join the discussion

by 800GMAT » Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:11 am
One concern - if we dont find the boundaries, how would we solve this problem then.....
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:56 am
800GMAT - I generally follow this approach.

Assume (1) to be true => x^2 < 2x < 1/x
Find the value of x using inequalities
x^2 < 1/x => x<1
2x < 1/x => x < 1/sqrt2 => x<0.70
Since x is positive (given in question stem) x can be between (0,0.7)

Take x as 0.5 , then x^2 < 2x < 1/x holds.

Apply this approach to remaining inequalities.

Hope this helps...
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:30 pm
800GMAT wrote:One concern - if we dont find the boundaries, how would we solve this problem then.....
You have a valid concern and is one that I dread the most as well.
Basically if we cannot make an educated guess at the boundaries, we
can never be sure.

In this particular problem, there are 3 values to compare -- 1/x, x^2 and 2x.

It should be immediately apparent that we have to try a value of x which is
in the range of 0 - 1. Also, we will try a value of x > 1. So, that will
knock out 2 out of 3 choices. However, to prove II, we need to plug
a value for x in the range 0.7 - 1...unfortunately this will be apparent
only if we know the boundaries...
Join the discussion