Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMATPrep question

Expert replies
by 800GMAT » Tue May 29, 2007 4:31 pm
GMATPrep Question
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by jayhawk2001 » Tue May 29, 2007 9:10 pm
Cut-n-pasting from one of my earlier replies...

With these kinds of questions, it is always useful to find the boundaries

We have 3 equations giving us 3 boundaries --

1/x = x^2 implies x = 1
1/x = 2x implies x = 0.7 approx
2x = x^2 implies x = 2

Our 3 boundaries are 0.7, 1 and 2

Take 1 sample for each range

For x<0.7, try x = 0.5
We have x^2 < 2x < 1/x ... bingo, you have (I) satisfied

For x>0.7 and <1, try x = 0.8
we have x^2 < 1/x < 2x ... bingo, you have (II) satisfied

It is easy to see that for all values x > 1, 1/x will give you the
least of the 3. So, (III) can never be true.

So, choose D (i.e. I and II alone)
Join the discussion

by 800GMAT » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:31 pm
Thnkx jayhawk..

D is the OA
Join the discussion

by thumpin_termis » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:28 pm
Great stuff. This brings up an additional question.

When looking for boundaries, it seems that even more can be found. Using couple of the above boundaries for example,

1/x = 2x
would imply
x^2 = 1/2, so x= positive and negative 0.7

and
2x = x^2
x^2 - 2x = 0
x(x-2) = 0
x = 2 and x=0

At this point, I have too many boundaries to test. Am I doing something incorrectly?
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:39 pm
thumpin_termis wrote:Great stuff. This brings up an additional question.

When looking for boundaries, it seems that even more can be found. Using couple of the above boundaries for example,

1/x = 2x
would imply
x^2 = 1/2, so x= positive and negative 0.7

and
2x = x^2
x^2 - 2x = 0
x(x-2) = 0
x = 2 and x=0

At this point, I have too many boundaries to test. Am I doing something incorrectly?
We are given that x is positive, so -0.7 is automatically out.

Also by virtue of x being positive, our lower-limit automatically
starts at 0. So, knowing one of our boundaries is 0.7, we will
have to choose something between 0 and 0.7. So, technically
no additional boundaries ;-)
Join the discussion

by thumpin_termis » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:19 am
Ah-hah. Another reminder to read the question carefully :oops:

Thanks a bunch!
Join the discussion

by 800GMAT » Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:11 am
One concern - if we dont find the boundaries, how would we solve this problem then.....
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:56 am
800GMAT - I generally follow this approach.

Assume (1) to be true => x^2 < 2x < 1/x
Find the value of x using inequalities
x^2 < 1/x => x<1
2x < 1/x => x < 1/sqrt2 => x<0.70
Since x is positive (given in question stem) x can be between (0,0.7)

Take x as 0.5 , then x^2 < 2x < 1/x holds.

Apply this approach to remaining inequalities.

Hope this helps...
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:30 pm
800GMAT wrote:One concern - if we dont find the boundaries, how would we solve this problem then.....
You have a valid concern and is one that I dread the most as well.
Basically if we cannot make an educated guess at the boundaries, we
can never be sure.

In this particular problem, there are 3 values to compare -- 1/x, x^2 and 2x.

It should be immediately apparent that we have to try a value of x which is
in the range of 0 - 1. Also, we will try a value of x > 1. So, that will
knock out 2 out of 3 choices. However, to prove II, we need to plug
a value for x in the range 0.7 - 1...unfortunately this will be apparent
only if we know the boundaries...
Join the discussion