BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep QP1 :Letter to the editor: Our city

Expert replies
by NandishSS » Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:15 am
Letter to the editor: Our city plans to allow major commercial development along the south waterfront and, in so doing, to increase its tax revenue. But, to succeed commercially, the development would inevitably create far more road traffic than the existing roads to the waterfront can handle, causing serious traffic congestion. Providing enough roads or public transportation to the area would cost far more than the city could gain from the increased tax revenue.

Which of the following, if added to the city's plan, would be most likely to help solve the problem the letter describes?

(A) Funding construction of new roads to the waterfront with a system of tolls on the new roads to the waterfront

(B) Allowing residential development along the waterfront so that there will be waterfront residents who can walk to the commercial development

(C) giving tax breaks to developers of businesses along the waterfront to offset any tax levied on them for construction of roads or public recreation

(D) Evaluating the net benefits that the commercial development would bring to the city in terms of improved quality of life for the city's residents rather than its financial terms

(E) Allowing commercial development in other city neighborhoods whose roads are not seriously congested with traffic

OA: A Why is B wrong?

Thanks
Nandish
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:10 pm
This question asks us to add a piece of information that would solve a problem, so this is most nearly like questions that ask us to resolve a discrepancy.

We need to keep true all of the given information, while solving the problem that these roads will "cost far more than the city could gain from the increased tax revenue." Thus, we want an answer choice that outlines either a) another source of revenue, or b) another way to offset the costs described.


(A) Funding construction of new roads to the waterfront with a system of tolls on the new roads to the waterfront
Tolls = new source of revenue, directly related to the roads. This would help.

(B) Allowing residential development along the waterfront so that there will be waterfront residents who can walk to the commercial development
This does not necessarily offset costs. These new residents are not necessarily the same people who would have been driving to the waterfront, so this doesn not necessarily represent a traffic decrease. We have to assume that the given premises - the fact that we need to build new roads - will still be true, so additional residential development will not drive down this cost. In fact, it's likely to drive up other costs.

(C) giving tax breaks to developers of businesses along the waterfront to offset any tax levied on them for construction of roads or public recreation
Tax break = loss of revenue for the city. That's the opposite of helpful in fixing this problem.

(D) Evaluating the net benefits that the commercial development would bring to the city in terms of improved quality of life for the city's residents rather than its financial terms
Irrelevant to the problem we're trying to solve. "What fixes the problem of costs outweighing revenue?" "Think about things other than money." Nope, not a solution!

(E) Allowing commercial development in other city neighborhoods whose roads are not seriously congested with traffic
That doesn't fix THIS problem. Keep as a given that we're going to build along this waterfront, and we need roads to it. This doesn't provide a solution to the cost problem with the waterfront.

The answer is A.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion