BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep DS question (#8) - Probability

Expert replies
by Kansonne » Sun Apr 15, 2007 3:28 pm
Hello, All--

Can someone please explain the rationale behind this question (#8 on one of the GMATPrep practice exams):

Each of the 25 balls in a certain box is either red, blue, or white and has a number from 1 to 10 painted on it. If one ball is to be selected at random from the box, what is the probability that the ball selected will either be white or have an even number painted on it?

(1) The probability that the ball will both be white and have an even number painted on it is 0.

(2) The probability that the ball will be white minus the probability that the ball will have an even number painted on it is 0.2.

.....

I selected (A) only the first statement is sufficient, because statement (1) is telling me that the two events are mutually exclusive. Therefore, the probability of the ball being white is 1/3 and the probability of the number on the ball being even is 1/2. Add those to probabilities together (since we're trying to find the union), and we get 5/6.

I had no idea what statement (2) was telling me, let alone if it's useful or not.

HOWEVER, the correct answer is (E) - both statements together are not sufficient.

My question is, Is (E) the answer because no info about the number of red, blue, or white balls given and no info about which exact numbers from 1 and 10 were on all the balls?

Any help/enlightenment is appreciated.

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Kansonne wrote: My question is, Is (E) the answer because no info about the number of red, blue, or white balls given and no info about which exact numbers from 1 and 10 were on all the balls?

Any help/enlightenment is appreciated.

Thanks!
Yes, you cannot assume that probability of selecting a white ball is 1/3
since there's no mention of the number of balls of each type or that
there's equal probability of a ball being white, red or blue.

We are asked to find P(w) + P(even) - P(w n even)

1 tells us that P(w n even) = 0. So, it doesn't help

2 tells us that P(w) - P(even) = 0.2. Doesn't help

Combining 1 and 2, we can't arrive at P(w) + P(even)

So, E
Join the discussion

Thanks!

by Kansonne » Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:23 pm
Thanks, jayhawk2001!
Join the discussion