BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep - comparison, effective sentence

Expert replies

by aspirant2011 » Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:18 am
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:There's nothing grammatically wrong in C, but there's definitely a distorted/illogical meaning. The last few posts are close to putting their finger on the issue: C puts all three verbs on the same level: do very little impulse buying, do not buy skis and boomerang, leave with basketball. This is a conceptual mistake, rather than a grammar one: the last two portions are a lower level example of "very little impulse shopping", and should be separated from the main clause.

D correctly puts the first part (Do very little shopping) on a separate level above the remaining two clauses with the use of the semicolon separating verb one from its examples.
Hi geva, isn't the usage of as well awkward in D????
no, it's fine where it is. You actually need it there. Think about it: if you take out the as well, you don't know whether the impulse buyer buys the skis and boomerang as well as the basketball, or instead of the basketball. The additional phrase actually eliminates ambiguity.
thanks for helping me out but I still have a doubt i.e isn't the usage of not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang itself explanatory that after buying basketball they won't buy skis and a boomerang???????
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:32 am
aspirant2011 wrote:
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:There's nothing grammatically wrong in C, but there's definitely a distorted/illogical meaning. The last few posts are close to putting their finger on the issue: C puts all three verbs on the same level: do very little impulse buying, do not buy skis and boomerang, leave with basketball. This is a conceptual mistake, rather than a grammar one: the last two portions are a lower level example of "very little impulse shopping", and should be separated from the main clause.

D correctly puts the first part (Do very little shopping) on a separate level above the remaining two clauses with the use of the semicolon separating verb one from its examples.
Hi geva, isn't the usage of as well awkward in D????
no, it's fine where it is. You actually need it there. Think about it: if you take out the as well, you don't know whether the impulse buyer buys the skis and boomerang as well as the basketball, or instead of the basketball. The additional phrase actually eliminates ambiguity.
thanks for helping me out but I still have a doubt i.e isn't the usage of not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang itself explanatory that after buying basketball they won't buy skis and a boomerang???????
@aspirant2011

D. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well

I understand this is a small subtle point. Just an advice, Try reading this sentence both with and without AS WELL many times.
You will feel as well helps in differentiating two events and not list of items.
Also, if we remove as well(read it once more ;)), i get a feeling as if it is putting some condition/constraint that a person who buys a basket ball won't but boomerang and a ski, but ofcourse the intended meaning is not this.

I hope I make some sense !!
Join the discussion

by nafiul9090 » Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:13 pm
i just read thread of Ron
https://www.beatthegmat.com/companies-in ... tml#368498

if i didnt read that first i would pick C

the issue between C and D is logical meaning over grammatical justification

regards nafi
Join the discussion