BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep 2

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:02 am
Is xy > 0 ?

1. x - y > -2
2. x - 2y < -6
Statement 1: x > y-2
If y=2 and x=1, is 1*2 > 0? Yes.
If y=-1 and x=1, is 1*(-1) > 0? No.
Since the answer is YES in the first case but NO in the second case, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: x < 2y-6
If y=1 and x=-10, is 1*(-10) > 0? No.
If y=10 and x=1, is 1*10 > 0? Yes.
Since the answer is NO in the first case but YES in the second case, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Linking together the two statements, we get:
y-2 < x < 2y-6
y-2 < 2y-6
y > 4.
Since y > 4 and x > y-2, we know that x > 2.
Thus, x and y are both positive, with the result that xy > 0.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:22 am
Is xy > 0 ?

1. x - y > -2
2. x - 2y < -6
Target question: Is xy>0?

Statement 1: x-y > -2
There are several pairs of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x = 5 and y = 1, in which case xy is greater than 0
Case b: x = 5 and y = -1, in which case xy is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x - 2y < -6
There are several pairs of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 and y = 5, in which case xy is greater than 0
Case b: x = -1 and y = 5, in which case xy is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Here's what we know:
x-y > -2
x-2y < -6

Since both inequalities have an x, let's isolate x in both of them to get:
y-2 < x
x < 2y-6

Aside: Notice that I rewrote them so that the 2 inequality symbols are pointing in the same direction.

Now we can combine these inequalities to get: y-2 < x < 2y-6
Next, remove the x to get: y-2 < 2y-6
Then subtract y from both sides and add 6 to both sides to get: 4 < y
Great, we now know that y is positive.
Also, if y-2 < x (and y>4), then we know that x must also be positive
Since we now know that x and y are positive, we can be certain that xy is greater than 0

So, the answer is C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:42 pm
Mitch, I think you accidentally posted the solution to the wrong question!

I'll add 2 things to Brent's great explanation:

a) As I'm sure you know, any time you see an inequality relative to 0, frame your question in terms of positives and negatives.
Is xy > 0?
Rephrased question: do x and y have the same sign?

Brent gave good examples of testing numbers to prove that x and y could have the same sign or different signs with each statement individually.

b) If you'd prefer not to isolate x first, you can combine the inequalities by simply flipping the second one around:
x - 2y < -6 --> -6 > x - 2y

Now, line up the inequalities and you can add them together:

x - y > -2
-6 > x - 2y
_______________
x - y - 6 > x - 2y - 2


Simplify: -y - 6 > -2y - 2
y - 6 > -2
y > 4


Substitute:
x - (grt 4) > -2
x > 2


x and y are both positive, so together the statements are sufficient.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:55 pm
ceilidh.erickson wrote:Mitch, I think you accidentally posted the solution to the wrong question!
Thanks for pointing this out, Ceilidh.
My post above now offers a solution to the correct question.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by J N » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:50 pm
but if substitute in 2nd equation does not hold?

y>4

-6 > x - 2y

-6> x - 2(grt4)

-6> x -grt8

grt 2 > x

x could be 0 or neg ?
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Jan 25, 2015 8:26 pm
J N, I'd think of it this way.

x - y > -2, or x > y - 2.

Since y > 4, y - 2 > 2.

We know that x > y - 2, so x > 2.
Join the discussion