Poverty line

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:40 am
Thanked: 3 times

Poverty line

by crak.gmat » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:18 pm
The United States government uses only a household's cash income before taxes to determine whether that household falls below the poverty line in a given year; capital gains, non-cash government benefits, and tax credits are not included. However, yearly cash income is not a fool-proof measure of a given household's disposable income. For example, retirees who live off of capital gains from an extensive portfolio could earn hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet be classified by the government as living in "poverty" because this income is not included in the calculation.

Which of the following, if true, validates the contention that the government's calculation methods must be altered in order to provide statistics that measure true poverty?
A. For more than 99% of those classified as living in poverty, yearly cash income comprises the vast majority of each household's disposable income.
B. While the government’s calculation method indicated a 12.5% poverty rate in 2003, the same calculation method indicated anywhere from a 9% to a 16% poverty rate during the preceding decade.
C. Most established research studies conducted by the private sector indicate that the number of people truly living in poverty in the U.S. is less than that indicated by the government’s calculation method.
D. Several prominent economists endorse an alternate calculation method which incorporates all income, not just cash income, and adjusts for taxes paid and other core expenses.
E. The government’s calculation method also erroneously counts those who do not earn income in a given year but who have substantial assets on which to live during that year.



Explanations??

OA C
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:31 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:760

(c)

by rogue_rohit » Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:51 am
I will go with (c).

Explanation

The rationale for altering the method of calculating poverty statistics can only be that the current method does give an accurate account of the true poverty.

Solution (c) compares the government results with most established research studies. It shows that the government method includes a lot false positives in the statistics and hence an inflated poverty percentage. Hence it should be changed

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:13 am
IMO: A
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org

Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by niraj_a » Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:33 am
C for me.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by banker1 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:03 pm
IMO: C

I was between (C) and (E).

(A) weakens the contention that the calculation needs to be altered.

(B) is irrelevant

(C) provides information that the government's calculation is wrong and should be altered

(D) doesn't provide information as to the erroneous nature of the government's calculation

(E) is another piece of information about the government's calculation and its erroneous nature but is not as good as (C).

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:36 pm
E is almost indirectly stated in the pessage so can not be the answer.

C is the correct ans.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:00 am
Thanked: 6 times

by mastbombay » Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:45 pm
Method used by Govt gives an inflated % of those who live below poverty.

To rectify this problem , we require a new method that shud report accurate statics.

As E just restates the info stated in the passage, C is the right answer.

It compares the statics reproted by the most establsihed agency ( Hence can be trusted to be accurate ) with those reported by the govt. and clearly tells that stats reported by govt are faulty in that they inflate the % of those living below povety line.

Hence this choice supports the contention that new method must be used.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat009 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:51 am
What's wrong with A.
Also how can we believe the results of private company and based on those results say that those reported by government are false. It may be possible that private company has something wrong and got wrong results.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by lachlanc » Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:44 pm
gmat009 wrote:What's wrong with A.
Also how can we believe the results of private company and based on those results say that those reported by government are false. It may be possible that private company has something wrong and got wrong results.
gmat009, the question asks "Which of the following, if true, validates the contention that the government's calculation methods must be altered in order to provide statistics that measure true poverty?"

(A) does not validate that the contention, it weakens it!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:58 am
I believe the correct answer should be A.