BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep Test - Strange Operator Question

Expert replies
by v_schame » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:13 pm
Hi,

I was doing Test Prep 1 with the official software and I'm pretty stumpped with one question.

If the operation @ is defined for all integers a and b by a@b = a+b-ab, which of the following statements must be true for all integers a, b, and c?

I. a@b = b@a
II. a@0 = a
III. (a@b)@c = a@(b@c)

Answers:
I only
II only
I and II only
I and III only
I, II, and III (CORRECT ANSWER)

Thanks for any help you can give me!

V.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Tommy Wallach » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:29 pm
Hey V_schame,

This is a function question, like f(x) = 2x, only they made up a funny symbol to make it more confusing. All it means is that whatever two numbers go on either side of the @ symbol, you need to run them through that little program (add them together, and subtract the product).

I. a@b = a + b - ab
b@a = b + a - ba

Does: a + b - ab = b + a - ba? Indeed it does!

II. a@0= a + 0 - a*0 = a Hey, that one is true, too!

III. This is a complicated one. Let's start with just the left side, and save ourselves time by remembering we already know what a@b is:

(a@b)@c = (a + b - ab)@c

Now, remember that the (a + b - ab) will represent just the "a", in terms of the original function, while the c represents the "b" in the original function:

(a + b - ab)@c = (a + b - ab) + c - (a + b - ab) * c

Phew! That's the left side done! The right will be the same, only with the letters scrambled around:

(b@c) = b + c - bc

So now notice that (b + c - bc) represents the "b" part of the original equation, while the "a" is just the same old a:

a@(b + c - bc) = a + (b + c - bc) - a * (b + c - bc)

Okay, now we have both sides, so let's see if they're equal:

(a + b - ab) + c - (a + b - ab) * c = a + (b + c - bc) - a * (b + c - bc)

a + b - ab + c - ac - bc + abc = a + b + c - bc - ab - ac + abc

If you start doing some adding and subtracting, you'll see that the exact same terms are on both sides. They're equal!

That was a toughie!

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:30 pm
v_schame wrote:Hi,

I was doing Test Prep 1 with the official software and I'm pretty stumpped with one question.

If the operation @ is defined for all integers a and b by a@b = a+b-ab, which of the following statements must be true for all integers a, b, and c?

I. a@b = b@a
II. a@0 = a
III. (a@b) @ c = a @ (b@c)

Answers:
I only
II only
I and II only
I and III only
I, II, and III
a@b = a + b - ab.
In other words, a@b = SUM - PRODUCT.

Statement I is included in four of the five answer choices.
Thus, it is almost certain that statement I must be true.
Otherwise, a test-taker will be able to eliminate four answer choices simply by evaluating statement I.
To save time, start with statement II.

To make the process easier, plug in values.
Let a=2, b=3, and c=10.

Statement II: a@0 = a
2@0 = 2
2+0 - (2*0) = 2
2 = 2.
On the left side, we simply added and subtracted 0 from the value of a=2.
From this example, we can see that statement II will be true for any integer value of a.
Eliminate A and D, which do not include statement II.

Statement III: (a@b) @ c = a @ (b@c)
First calculate the values INSIDE THE PARENTHESES.

(2@3) @ 10 = 2 @ (3@10)

(2+3 - 2*3) @ 10 = 2 @ (3+10 - 3*10)

-1 @ 10 = 2 @ -17

-1 + 10 - (-1*10) = 2 + (-17) - (2)(-17)

19 = 19.

When a=2, b=3 and c=10, statement III is true.
While not a definitive proof, it seems VERY unlikely that these 3 randomly selected values would prove to be an exceptional case.
Eliminate B and C, which do not include statement III.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by lazarogb » Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:20 am
Hello Mitch,

Ran into this questions just yesterday on a practice test and got it wrong. I also went for the plug in approach but then I got a little nervous because I thought I might need to test other values like negative integers in order to prove it.

I notice you went for numbers other than 0 or 1 that tend to skew answers when plugging in on certain cases.

Is there any other information that made you think that plugging negative integers was not necessary?

Thanks!


GMATGuruNY wrote:
v_schame wrote:Hi,

I was doing Test Prep 1 with the official software and I'm pretty stumpped with one question.

If the operation @ is defined for all integers a and b by a@b = a+b-ab, which of the following statements must be true for all integers a, b, and c?

I. a@b = b@a
II. a@0 = a
III. (a@b) @ c = a @ (b@c)

Answers:
I only
II only
I and II only
I and III only
I, II, and III
a@b = a + b - ab.
In other words, a@b = SUM - PRODUCT.

Statement I is included in four of the five answer choices.
Thus, it is almost certain that statement I must be true.
Otherwise, a test-taker will be able to eliminate four answer choices simply by evaluating statement I.
To save time, start with statement II.

To make the process easier, plug in values.
Let a=2, b=3, and c=10.

Statement II: a@0 = a
2@0 = 2
2+0 - (2*0) = 2
2 = 2.
On the left side, we simply added and subtracted 0 from the value of a=2.
From this example, we can see that statement II will be true for any integer value of a.
Eliminate A and D, which do not include statement II.

Statement III: (a@b) @ c = a @ (b@c)
First calculate the values INSIDE THE PARENTHESES.

(2@3) @ 10 = 2 @ (3@10)

(2+3 - 2*3) @ 10 = 2 @ (3+10 - 3*10)

-1 @ 10 = 2 @ -17

-1 + 10 - (-1*10) = 2 + (-17) - (2)(-17)

19 = 19.

When a=2, b=3 and c=10, statement III is true.
While not a definitive proof, it seems VERY unlikely that these 3 randomly selected values would prove to be an exceptional case.
Eliminate B and C, which do not include statement III.

The correct answer is E.
Join the discussion