BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

John and Peter

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:56 am
Thanked: 1 times

John and Peter

by ST » Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:41 pm
A basketball coach will select the members of a five-players team from armog 9 players, including John and Peter. If the five players are chosen at random, What is the probability that the coach chooses a team that includes both John and Peter?

a. 1/9
b. 1/6
c. 2/9
d. 5/18
e. 1/3

Answer is D
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:49 am
Thanked: 36 times

Re: John and Peter

by dtweah » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:13 pm
ST wrote:A basketball coach will select the members of a five-players team from armog 9 players, including John and Peter. If the five players are chosen at random, What is the probability that the coach chooses a team that includes both John and Peter?

a. 1/9
b. 1/6
c. 2/9
d. 5/18
e. 1/3

Answer is D
(2C2 x 7C3)/9C5=5/18
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:53 pm
Location: Sao Paulo-Brazil
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:660

by shibal » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:37 pm
dtweah, why did you do 2c2*7c3? i disconsidered it and got 5/18. maybe i was lucky but what is the concept behind it?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:56 am
Thanked: 1 times

by ST » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:38 pm
could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:01 am
Location: India
Thanked: 2 times

by imhimanshu » Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:42 pm
let me explain this:
total number of outcomes=9C5 i.e selecting five persons from 9 guys
number of favourable = 7C3 since jhn and peter are already included. we need to select 3 guys out of remaing 7. i.e 7C3
so probability= 7C3/9C5 =5/18 hence D
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:49 am
Thanked: 36 times

by dtweah » Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:06 am
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

by real2008 » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:29 pm
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:49 am
Thanked: 36 times

by dtweah » Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:11 pm
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:710

by skprocks » Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:15 pm
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:710

by skprocks » Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:17 pm
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:49 am
opposite event will be: none of them is in the team + only one of them is in the team

skprocks wrote:
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:05 am
skprocks wrote:
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
The approach you're using is:

P(good outcome) = 1 - P(bad outcome)

To use this approach, we have to account for ALL the different ways to get a bad outcome:

P(not both J and P) = P(not J and not P) + P(J or P and 4 others)

P(not J and not P) = 7c5/9c5 = 1/6
P(J or P and 4 others) = 2 * 7c4/9c5 = 5/9
P(not both J and P) = 1/6 + 5/9 = 13/18

So P(both J and P) = 1 - 13/18 = 5/18.

I'd use this approach only when P(bad outcome) is easier to determine than P(good outcome). In this problem, P(good outcome) involves less math.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1