BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by jeenashiva » Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:58 am
Yes, the answer is C. We need both statements to find the answer.


Statement 1:

it indicates both the Max number and Min number can be negative or Positive.

Negative * negative = positive
Positive * positive = positive

But it does not say how many number are there.

Statement 2:
It says that there are even numbers in the set.

If you multiply any even number of positive numbers, the answer will be always positive.

Also, if you multiply any even number of negative numbers, the answer will be always positive.

(-1 * -4* -5* -6 = +120)

So we need both statements to find the answer.
Join the discussion

by bbaah » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:15 am
(1) If the product is of the greatest and smallest integers is+ve, then the integers are either both positive or both negative.

Eg. 1x7 =7, (+), -1x-7 = 7, also (+),

However, without further information about the number of integers in the list, one cannot tell the sign of the product. Not Sufficient.

(2) If there is an even number of integers in the list, the product can be either positive or negative.

Eg. 1x7 = 7 (+)
-1x7 = -7 (-)

Not Sufficient.

Considering both statements,

If there is an even number of integers in the list, and the product of the greatest and smallest integers in the list is positive, then the product of all the integers must also be positive, since the product of an even number of +ve integers is +ve, and the product of an even number of -ve integers will also be +ve.

Eg. (+)(+)(+)(+) = (+)

(-)(-)(-)(-) = (+)

Also, remember from the explanation in (1) above that since the product of the greatest and smallest integers is positive, the numbers must all be either positive or negative. You can't have (-1)(1)(2)(7) as the product because (-1)(7) = -7, which violates the requirement that the product of the greatest and smallest integers be +ve.

Both statements together are sufficient to answer the question in the stem, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:24 pm
Take stmt 1)

If the product of greatest and smallest is positive then both these numbers either are positive or negative.

If they are negative then there is no telling if the product of all in the list is postive

Stmt 1)by itself is insufficient so it bolis down to B,C,E

Take stmt 2

There is a even set of elements in the list

stmt 2 by itself doesnt gaurantee the product of all elements to be positive
since the elemenst could all be positive all be negative or a combinaion of pos and neg

When we take stmt1 and stmt2 together we know the highest and lowest are both neg or both pos and if it all negative then the product of even number of negative numbers is always positive. If its all positive the the product is always positive

there fore C)
Join the discussion

by vaivish » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:13 pm
thanks for the replies. But i think we are assuming here that we have either all the integers as + or -, which is not a valid assumptions.

e.g. If we have -3,-1, 2, -5...in this case the 1st and 2nd statements get satisfied. But still we cant say that the product is +.

The argument only says list of different integers. It can be mixed one as i have mentioned above. But while answering all of you have assumed that all integers are either + or -.


Any thoughts on this?
Join the discussion