• The Princeton Review
    FREE GMAT Exam
    Know how you'd score today for $0

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    The Princeton Review
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors

Admissions Success Stories GMAT Prep RC

This topic has 1 expert reply and 0 member replies
bounce87 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
26 Mar 2016
Posted:
16 messages

GMAT Prep RC

Post Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:03 am
During the nineteenth-century, occupational information about women that was provided by the United States census-a population count conducted each decade-became more detailed and precise in response to social changes. Through 1840, simple enumeration by household mirrored a home-based agricultural economy and hierarchical social order: the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories. Like farms, most enterprises were family-run, so that the census measured economic activity as an attribute of the entire household, rather than of individuals.
The 1850 census, partly responding to antislavery and women’s rights movements, initiated the collection of specific information about each individual in a household. Not until 1870 was occupational information analyzed by gender: the census superintendent reported 1.8 million women employed outside the home in “gainful and reputable occupations.” In addition, he arbitrarily attributed to each family one woman “keeping house.” Overlap between the two groups was not calculated until 1890, when the rapid entry of women into the paid labor force and social issues arising from industrialization were causing women’s advocates and women statisticians to press for more thorough and accurate accounting of women’s occupations and wages.

How does this detail "the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories" contribute to the main point of the passage which is "how the census did not properly count women in the workforce"? The passage does say that "other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories". Doesn't this mean that women were counted?
Please explain!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:21 pm
It helps to include the specific problem that you struggled with here.

To your question, imagine this hypothetical:
Household A:
Head of Household: John Farmer
# of other household members: 7
occupation: farming

Would you say that we have counted the women in this case? How many of those 7 were women? We cannot assume 1 man + 1 woman + children. There may be in-laws or other extended family members in the household.

Women were not left out of the census, so they were counted... with the men an children. But they were not counted specifically, so we cannot say how many women exactly worked in each profession.

Does that help?

_________________


Ceilidh Erickson
Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education


Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience.
Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.

Top First Responders*

1 GMATGuruNY 62 first replies
2 Jay@ManhattanReview 61 first replies
3 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma... 34 first replies
4 Brent@GMATPrepNow 23 first replies
5 Jeff@TargetTestPrep 6 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

Most Active Experts

1 image description Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

124 posts
2 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

96 posts
3 image description Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

88 posts
4 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

84 posts
5 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

76 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts