BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep question

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: gmat prep question

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:42 pm
yvonne12 wrote:If Xand Y are positive, which of the following would be greater than 1/ sqrt x+y?

1. Sqrt x+y/2x

2. sqrt x + sqrt y/ x+y

3. Sqrt X - sqrt y /x+y
I think this is best solved by subst values for x and y.

Take x = 1, y = 8

1/sqrt x+y = 1/3 which is < 1

1 - sqrt (9/2) > 1

2 - sqrt (1) + sqrt (8/9) > 1

3 - sqrt (1) - sqrt (8/9) = 1 - 2*1.4/3 = .2/3
This is less than 1/3


I think 1 and 2 alone satisfy the conditions.
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Mon May 28, 2007 9:07 am
Jay

What is the difference between

"Which of them would be greater" and "Which of them must be greater"
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Mon May 28, 2007 5:40 pm
f2001290 wrote:Jay

What is the difference between

"Which of them would be greater" and "Which of them must be greater"
In the context of the question, I guess "would be" and "must be"
have the same meaning.

In general "must be" is a condition that should ALWAYS be true.
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Tue May 29, 2007 8:24 am
Jay

OA for this question is 2. Refer the attachment. I got it from some other forum.
Attachments
1.JPG
1.JPG
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Tue May 29, 2007 12:13 pm
f2001290 wrote:Jay

OA for this question is 2. Refer the attachment. I got it from some other forum.
Since we are asked prove "must", we have to ensure that the condition
holds true for all values.

Looking at I, II and III, you can infer that calculations will involve a lot
of root.

To simplify, Take a pythogorean triplet, x=64, y=36, so that x+y = 100

I and III immediately fall apart. You can eliminate B, D and E.

To evaluate II,

sqrt-x + sqrt-y / (x + y)
= (sqrt-x + sqrt-y) / sqrt (x+y)*sqrt(x+y) ..... eqn-a

To see if II is greater than 1/sqrt(x+y), we have to prove

sqrt-x + sqrt-y / sqrt(x+y) > 1 i.e. numerator of eqn-a should be > 1

i.e. prove sqrt-x + sqrt-y > sqrt(x+y)

Since we are dealing with positive values for x and y, we know
the above will hold true. Hence sufficient.

So, II it is.
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:10 am
Is there any methodical approach to this problem.

At times, I feel that substituting values is a tedious job and there is ample scope for getting such inequality problems wrong.
Join the discussion