Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

gmat prep q 4

Expert replies
by Aspirant008 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:20 am
gmat prep q 3
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Vignesh.4384 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:11 pm
Hey,

I got the answer for this 1 .
It was by substitution method .. and believe me it takes a lot of time ..
Can some one suggest a better idea to do this sum ?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:44 am
Notice that if a > b, and c > d, then a+c must be greater than b+d. We can use that here, but we need to rewrite one of the inequalities first, so that both are in the same direction (>). We can multiply the second inequality by -1 (reversing the inequality)

x - y > -2
-x + 2y > 6

adding these:

y > 4

And since x - y > -2, x > y - 2, so x > 2. Since x and y are both positive, xy must be positive.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:51 am
Alternatively, you can do 2-variable inequality problems graphically. Look at the first inequality:

x - y > -2, or rearranging:
y < x + 2

This inequality represents a region in the co-ordinate plane. The line

y = x + 2

is the boundary between the regions
y < x + 2 and
y > x + 2

You can draw that line, work out that when y < x + 2, the points must be below the line, and see all of the possible values for (x, y). We can do the same for the second equation, and thereby find the region where both inequalities must be true (they will be true for all points below the line y = x +2 which are above the line y = 0.5x + 3, and these points are only in the first quadrant). It's easier to see if you draw the picture.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:37 am
Thanks Ian.

Very useful ideas.

How would u rate this problem ? easy or tough ?

Seemed a bit diff at first but wasnt the case after seeing ur answer.

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:16 am
Vignesh.4384 wrote:Thanks Ian.

Very useful ideas.

How would u rate this problem ? easy or tough ?

Seemed a bit diff at first but wasnt the case after seeing ur answer.
Well, I think most GMAT math questions seem easy once you see how to do them- it's seeing how to do them that can be tricky. I definitely don't think this question is an 'easy' GMAT problem - it's a two-variable inequality problem, which already makes it a bit complicated, and I don't think it's easy to arrive at the right answer using shortcut methods like choosing numbers. So my quick assessment- it's probably a medium-difficult problem. That said, it can be quite surprising to see which questions are actually calibrated as difficult questions on the test, and which ones as easy questions- it's sometimes surprisingly hard to judge.
Join the discussion