BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmat Prep PT1 question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Ian Stewart » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:01 pm
A very common mistake on DS questions, especially under the time pressure of the test, is missing information provided in the question. p is an odd integer here, so only one of your two examples is applicable.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Reader » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Ian Stewart wrote:A very common mistake on DS questions, especially under the time pressure of the test, is missing information provided in the question. p is an odd integer here, so only one of your two examples is applicable.

Thanks a lot!! BTW how to do it with method other than plug in? I could see that for statement one it must be 1, but for 2 I can only use plug-in. Or maybe it's a good way?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:30 pm
Plugging in numbers is a more reliable approach for remainders questions than for questions on pretty much any other subject - there's a whole area of math that you don't need to know about called modular arithmetic that guarantees remainders follow certain patterns, so what's true for a couple of sets of numbers is usually true for other numbers.

One fact from modular arithmetic that can be useful to know: you can add remainders, as long as you're dividing by a fixed number. That is (to take an example), if the remainder is 2 when you divide x by 7, and the remainder is 3 when you divide y by 7, the remainder will be 5 when you divide x+y by 7. You could use that here (along with the first part of the explanation below) to see that the remainder should be 1 using Statement 2.

We can prove everything in the abstract, though it's a bit tedious to do:

if p is odd, and p is the sum of two squares, it must be the sum of an odd square and an even square - that is, it must be the sum of the square of an even number and the square of an odd number. So we know p = x^2 + y^2, where x is even and y is odd.

If you take an even number x, we can write x as 2k, for some integer k. Then x^2 = 4*k^2. That is, every even square is a multiple of 4.

If you take an odd number y, we can write y as 2m + 1, for some integer m. Then y^2 = (2m + 1)^2 = 4m^2 + 4m + 1 = 4(m^2 + m) + 1. So any odd square is 1 more than a multiple of 4 -- that is, it has a remainder of 1 when you divide by 4.

If we now add: p = x^2 + y^2 = 4k^2 + 4m^2 + 4m + 1 = 4(k^2 + m^2 + m) + 1, we see that p is one more than a multiple of 4, so the remainder must be 1 when we divide p by 4.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by cramya » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:35 pm
Wow.....

Thanks Ian for a wonderful approach.
That is (to take an example), if the remainder is 2 when you divide x by 7, and the remainder is 3 when you divide y by 7, the remainder will be 5 when you divide x+y by 7.
On the same note this can be extended for subtraction and multiplication. Correct me if I am mistaken here.



Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by Reader » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:55 pm
Ian you are amazing! Thanks for the answer, I guess I will stick with plug for this type of question. I doubt I will able to do what you did in less than 5 mins, even if I know it.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:18 am
cramya wrote:
That is (to take an example), if the remainder is 2 when you divide x by 7, and the remainder is 3 when you divide y by 7, the remainder will be 5 when you divide x+y by 7.
On the same note this can be extended for subtraction and multiplication. Correct me if I am mistaken here.
Yes, it can be extended to both multiplication and subtraction. The one thing I left out - you sometimes need to 'wrap' your answer back into the correct range for remainders. So, if:

-the remainder is 5 when j is divided by 7
-the remainder is 6 when k is divided by 7

then you can be sure that:

-Since 5 + 6 = 11, the remainder will be 4 when we divide j + k by 7 (we take the remainder when 11 is divided by 7, since 11 is too large to be the remainder here)

-Since 5 - 6 = -1, the remainder will be 6 when we divide j - k by 7 (since the remainder cannot be -1, we add 7 to get it into the correct range)

-Since 5*6 = 30, the remainder will be 2 when j*k is divided by 7 (again, we take the remainder when 30 is divided by 7, since 30 is too large).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion