Gmat Prep Must Be True

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: Melbourne
Thanked: 1 times

by jymloke » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:06 pm
1/x, 2x, x^2,

Number plugging, and since x is positive, test with x = 1/2 and x = 3

With
x = 1/2, can find that I is correct.

With
x = 3, I find that x^2 > 2x > 1/x.

Therefore for me, I only found I to be correct.

How is that II is also correct ?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:43 pm
jymloke wrote:1/x, 2x, x^2,

Number plugging, and since x is positive, test with x = 1/2 and x = 3

With
x = 1/2, can find that I is correct.

With
x = 3, I find that x^2 > 2x > 1/x.

Therefore for me, I only found I to be correct.

How is that II is also correct ?
II is correct for large fractions.

For example, if x = 9/10, then we get:

81/100 < 10/9 < 18/10

which is true.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:47 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
II is correct for large fractions.

For example, if x = 9/10, then we get:

81/100 < 10/9 < 18/10

which is true.
Stuart,

How did you know that ? I just tried

three values:

0, 1/2 and 2

What is the algebra behind number 2 ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: Melbourne
Thanked: 1 times

by jymloke » Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:10 pm
Hi Stuart,

I like to understand your thought process when answering this sort of questions.

My initial thought process went like this,
try with x > 1 (integer) , x > 1 (fractions), x < 1(fractions)

I never thought of trying it with bigger fractions. The fractions I tested were

1/2 and 10/9 , integer that I tried was 3, since trying 2 would give 2x == x^2

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:22 pm
1/x < 2x

2x - 1/x > 0

2x^2-1 > 0

2x^2 > 1

x^2 > 1/2

x > 1/1.4

x > 10/14

x > 5/7


:D

NICE!!!

lets say x=6/7

X^2 = 36/49

1/X = 7/6

2X = 12/7

and this satisfies the evil statement II :twisted:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:16 am
jymloke wrote:Hi Stuart,

I like to understand your thought process when answering this sort of questions.

My initial thought process went like this,
try with x > 1 (integer) , x > 1 (fractions), x < 1(fractions)

I never thought of trying it with bigger fractions. The fractions I tested were

1/2 and 10/9 , integer that I tried was 3, since trying 2 would give 2x == x^2
Hi!

We know when comparing 1/x and x^2 that we don't need to try different fractions, since all fractions follow the same rule in this regard. However, when comparing 1/x and 2x, we can't be sure that different fractions will all give the same result.

A good general rule for picking numbers is to think about what types of numbers could give different answers. Going to extremes is often a good way to test things out. So, since I wasn't sure if all fractions would work out the same, I tried both a small one and a big one.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:26 pm
A good general rule for picking numbers is to think about what types of numbers could give different answers. Going to extremes is often a good way to test things out. So, since I wasn't sure if all fractions would work out the same, I tried both a small one and a big one.
Stuart,
I am sure that's why u r a 800 scorer on GMAT :-)

Thanks again for your valuable inputs!

Regards,
Cramya

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:18 pm
cramya wrote:
Stuart,
I am sure that's why u r a 800 scorer on GMAT :-)

Thanks again for your valuable inputs!
Cramya, I guess you have a value for Stuart's inputs, but I do not..they are really INVALUABLE!

Got ya! ;-)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:35 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by xyzabc123 » Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:35 pm
I used another approach:
in my mind, plot the three functions on a plane and see where they intersect by solving for x:
1/x = 2x
1/x = x^2
2x = x^2

1st: ~ 1/1.4 = 0.7
2nd: 1
3rd: 2

so if 0<x<1, then x^2 is smallest and 1/x intersects 2x at approximately 0.7
and if x > 1, then 1/x is smallest and 2x intersects x^2 at 2