gmat prep integers

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:52 pm
Thanked: 2 times

gmat prep integers

by vinviper1 » Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:41 pm
Thanks!
Attachments
Q27.JPG

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:52 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by vinviper1 » Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:31 pm
bumpy bump

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:15 pm
We really need to do this one by picking numbers.

It's easy to eliminate (1) and (2) individually, since each one gives us an infinite number of possible values for x. So, we're at the combination stage and know the answer must be either (c) or (e).

Let's pick numbers that work for both statements and see if we can narrow down x enough.

(1) x + y is closest to 4
(2) x - y is closest to 1

Well, we could pick x = 2.6 and y = 1.4. In this case, the closest integer to x is 3.

However, we could also pick x = 2.4 and y = 1.6. In this case, the closest integer to x is 2.

Since we can get more than 1 possible answer, the statements taken together are insufficient: choose (e).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:33 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:710

by leovonp » Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:32 pm
I tried to approach it analytically:

4 ~ x + y
1 ~ x - y

If you subtract the second statement from the first statement you end up with

3 ~ 2y

Which means y ~ 1.5 and x ~ 2.5

Now you are stuck in the middle and none of the statements really help you to solve the issue so you pick (e)

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:43 pm
Yes, it's certainly possible to do this without picking numbers.

From Statement 1:
3.5 < x+y < 4.5

and from Statement 2:
0.5 < x-y < 1.5

Combining these,

4 < 2x < 6
2 < x < 3

And thus not enough information to answer the question.

Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by netigen » Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:05 pm
Ian Stewart wrote:Yes, it's certainly possible to do this without picking numbers.

From Statement 1:
3.5 < x+y < 4.5

and from Statement 2:
0.5 < x-y < 1.5

Combining these,

4 < 2x < 6
2 < x < 3

And thus not enough information to answer the question.
Just a quick note.

The upper bounds will not be 4.5 and 1.5 but 4.49 and 1.49. Though this will not affect the reasoning and final answer.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:43 pm
netigen wrote:
Ian Stewart wrote:Yes, it's certainly possible to do this without picking numbers.

From Statement 1:
3.5 < x+y < 4.5

and from Statement 2:
0.5 < x-y < 1.5

Combining these,

4 < 2x < 6
2 < x < 3

And thus not enough information to answer the question.
Just a quick note.

The upper bounds will not be 4.5 and 1.5 but 4.49 and 1.49. Though this will not affect the reasoning and final answer.
No, the upper bounds will be as I've written them. I'm guessing you're assuming that we're writing things with two decimal place precision, but if x+y = 4.49999, it is still closer to 4 than it is to 5 (or any other integer, for that matter).