BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep geometry question

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by lunarpower » Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:03 am
RIGHT OFF THE BAT, MARK SIDES BD AND BC AS ISOSCELES.

TAKEAWAY #1: if they show a triangle containing equal angles, then it's the resultant equal sides that are important. if they show you a triangle containing equal sides, then it's the resultant equal angles that are important.

first, you should be able to eliminate choices (b) and (d) fairly quickly, because it should be fairly clear that statement 2 is insufficient. this is the case because, if only statement 2 is true, then you have NO lengths to work with at all; the sides of the figure could be numbers in the millions, tiny decimals, or anything in between. this situation is clearly insufficient for determining the length of one of the sides.

TAKEAWAY #2: you can't determine lengths/sizes unless you know the length/size of at least one thing in the picture.

now examine statement one.

here are two different approaches:

1. ALGEBRAIC APPROACH: (this is the preferred approach - this algebra is straightforward, albeit a bit tricky, but none of it requires any creative thinking at all)
just take advantage of the fact that there are 180 degrees in a triangle, and also 180 degrees in a straight line.

TAKEAWAY #3: almost every problem mixing variables and angles comes down to exactly the same two things: 180° in a triangle, and 180° in a straight line.

look at angle ADB. since the angle adjacent to it is 2x°, and the two angles together make a straight line, angle ADB must be (180 - 2x)°.

now look at angle ABD. this is a bit trickier, but you use the fact that a triangle has 180 degrees. therefore, add the other two angles together, and then subtract that total from 180°.
ABD = 180° - (x° + (180 - 2x)°)
= 180° - (180° - x°)
= 180° - 180° + x°
= x°

TAKEAWAY #4: don't forget to distribute subtraction when you have quantities in parentheses.

therefore, triangle ABD is isosceles.
therefore, AD = BD. but we already know BD = BC, so AD = BD = BC = 6.
sufficient.

approach #2 follows.[/list]
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:08 am
lunarpower wrote:RIGHT OFF THE BAT, MARK SIDES BD AND BC AS ISOSCELES.

TAKEAWAY #1: if they show a triangle containing equal angles, then it's the resultant equal sides that are important. if they show you a triangle containing equal sides, then it's the resultant equal angles that are important.

first, you should be able to eliminate choices (b) and (d) fairly quickly, because it should be fairly clear that statement 2 is insufficient. this is the case because, if only statement 2 is true, then you have NO lengths to work with at all; the sides of the figure could be numbers in the millions, tiny decimals, or anything in between. this situation is clearly insufficient for determining the length of one of the sides.

TAKEAWAY #2: you can't determine lengths/sizes unless you know the length/size of at least one thing in the picture.

now examine statement one.

here are two different approaches:

1. ALGEBRAIC APPROACH: (this is the preferred approach - this algebra is straightforward, albeit a bit tricky, but none of it requires any creative thinking at all)
just take advantage of the fact that there are 180 degrees in a triangle, and also 180 degrees in a straight line.

TAKEAWAY #3: almost every problem mixing variables and angles comes down to exactly the same two things: 180° in a triangle, and 180° in a straight line.

look at angle ADB. since the angle adjacent to it is 2x°, and the two angles together make a straight line, angle ADB must be (180 - 2x)°.

now look at angle ABD. this is a bit trickier, but you use the fact that a triangle has 180 degrees. therefore, add the other two angles together, and then subtract that total from 180°.
ABD = 180° - (x° + (180 - 2x)°)
= 180° - (180° - x°)
= 180° - 180° + x°
= x°

TAKEAWAY #4: don't forget to distribute subtraction when you have quantities in parentheses.

therefore, triangle ABD is isosceles.
therefore, AD = BD. but we already know BD = BC, so AD = BD = BC = 6.
sufficient.

approach #2 follows.[/list]
2. PLUG IN NUMBERS:
just plug in two wildly different values for x, and see what happens. if you get the same result twice, you can be fairly confident that the same result will hold all the time.

TAKEAWAY #5: geometry diagrams don't change abruptly; they either change smoothly when you change the value of a variable, or they don't change at all. so, if a quantity remains the same when two wildly different values of an angle are plugged in, then you can be pretty sure that it stays the same no matter what.

let's try x = 1°
then angle BDC = 2°
so angle ADB = 178°
there are 180° in triangle ADB, so angle ABD must be 180 - (178 + 1) = 1°
omg, triangle ABD is isosceles
therefore AD = BD (= BC)

let's try x = 40° (which is rather different from 1°)
then angle BDC = 80°
so angle ADB = 100°
there are 180° in triangle ADB, so angle ABD must be 180 - (100 + 40) = 40°
omg, triangle ABD is isosceles
therefore AD = BD (= BC)

omg wow, it was isosceles both times
i think it's isosceles every time
so bc must be 6 every time
sufficient

good stuff
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by pre-gmat » Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:22 pm
I had another approach to this.

angle BDC is exterior angle for Angle DAB and Angle ABD

So since Angle BDC =2x Angle ABD is x.

this means side AD and Side BD are same (isosclees property)
Given BD=BC so AD=BD

Therefore A is correct answer.

B is not sufficient.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:58 pm
pre-gmat wrote:I had another approach to this.

angle BDC is exterior angle for Angle DAB and Angle ABD

So since Angle BDC =2x Angle ABD is x.

this means side AD and Side BD are same (isosclees property)
Given BD=BC so AD=BD

Therefore A is correct answer.

B is not sufficient.
you can totally use the exterior angle approach, yes.

but the exterior angle approach doesn't discount the value of a GENERAL opener, such as the algebraic approach above. (i.e., the exterior angle approach is great when it's applicable, but it's applicable a lot less of the time than is the general approach outlined above.)

good stuff.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by pre-gmat » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:03 am
Thanks.
Join the discussion