BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmat prep CR - per capita expenditure

Expert replies
by hk_4u » Sat Dec 19, 2009 12:05 pm
For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually. In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices. Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?

(A) After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products.
(B) The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period.
(C) Improvements in manufacturing processes enabled drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.
(D) In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions.
(E) After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia.

OA - A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by papgust » Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:28 pm
I was able to knock off options B,C,D,E confidently. But i wasn't fully confident with OA as i didn't consider the fact that curbing of product price increases is applicable only for existing products and NOT for new products.

Check this out. Wonderful explanation by stacey.
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/for ... t2413.html
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:32 pm
Why A? it does not mean that the new products will be sold for more than the price cap set forth by the government ? What am I missing ?
Join the discussion

by sadullaevd » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:21 pm
plz take a look at previous post,

the link has nice explanation by Stacy
Stay skeptical,
Think critically,
Assume nothing.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:31 pm
sadullaevd wrote:plz take a look at previous post,

the link has nice explanation by Stacy


I understand her reasoning but I does not make sense to me. Choice A says that the companies are replacing the current medications, so, I concluded that price caps will apply to new medications because they are just a replacement.
Join the discussion

by sadullaevd » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:49 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:
sadullaevd wrote:plz take a look at previous post,

the link has nice explanation by Stacy


I understand her reasoning but I does not make sense to me. Choice A says that the companies are replacing the current medications, so, I concluded that price caps will apply to new medications because they are just a replacement.
I clearly see your point, but maybe "new medications" is meant to be new product name, new price and etc. If this is the case, then government's previous regulation won't work thus...

besides the rest choices don't give any hope, only A.
Stay skeptical,
Think critically,
Assume nothing.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:50 pm
Hesham,

you have to look at what was being prohibited. What was being prohibited was price increases on "their products".

But if a drug is new, then it's price is also new; therefore, there is no previous price from which it could have increased.

It doesn't matter that the new drug may be more costly than the old drug. And it doesn't even matter that the new drug is performing the same function as the old drug. Yes, this is sneaky on part of the drug manufacturers. They are basically escaping the "spirit" of the ministry prohibition; but because they have not increased the price of any of their drugs, they are not formally in breach of that prohibition.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion