BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS- x>3

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by liferocks » Wed May 19, 2010 8:48 pm
From 1

(x-1)>2 or (x-1)<-2
or x>3 or x<-1...not sufficient

From 2
(x-2)>3 or (x-2)<-3

or x>5 or x<-1..not sufficient

combining
x<-1.or x>5..not sufficient

Ans option E
Last edited by liferocks on Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by krazy800 » Wed May 19, 2010 8:54 pm
liferocks wrote:From 1

(x-1)>2 or (x-1)<-2
or x>3 or x<-1...not sufficient

From 2
(x-2)>3 or (x-2)<-3

or x>5 or x<-1..not sufficient

combining
x<-1...sufficient

Ans option C
IMO E

combining statements I and II

x<-1 or x>5

so E

plz correct me if am wrong
Aiming High
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 pm
krazy800 wrote:
liferocks wrote:From 1

(x-1)>2 or (x-1)<-2
or x>3 or x<-1...not sufficient

From 2
(x-2)>3 or (x-2)<-3

or x>5 or x<-1..not sufficient

combining
x<-1...sufficient

Ans option C
IMO E

combining statements I and II

x<-1 or x>5

so E

plz correct me if am wrong
hmm..agree with E.I have edited the post.Thanks for pointing out.
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by Rafter » Thu May 20, 2010 1:20 pm
It should be D . OA please.
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Fri May 21, 2010 10:26 am
Statement (1): (x-1)^2 > 4.
for the square of the left side to be more than 4, what's inside the parentheses must be greater than 2 (meaning x must be greater than 3) or what's inside the parentheses must be less than -2 (meaning x is smaller than -1). Because x is positive, the 2nd possibility is invalid and x must be greater than 3. (1) is sufficient.

Statement (2) can be solved in a very similar way and also found sufficient.

Answer is D. This is QID 1475

-Patrick
Join the discussion

by kel2010 » Fri May 21, 2010 1:52 pm
ans should be D.

for statement I all values above 3 give desired result
for statement II all vales above 5 give desired result.
Join the discussion

by nicajvch » Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 am
Why wouldnt it be the same for number less than -3?
Join the discussion

by T11 » Wed May 26, 2010 9:02 am
The Q says x is positive.

So, (x-1) cannot <= -2
ans similarly (x-2) cannot <= -3

Hence Both I & II are sufficient.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed May 26, 2010 10:40 am
tricky !!

People always miss small details like this one " x>0 " ( I too missed :()
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion