BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS- x>3

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by liferocks » Wed May 19, 2010 8:48 pm
From 1

(x-1)>2 or (x-1)<-2
or x>3 or x<-1...not sufficient

From 2
(x-2)>3 or (x-2)<-3

or x>5 or x<-1..not sufficient

combining
x<-1.or x>5..not sufficient

Ans option E
Last edited by liferocks on Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by krazy800 » Wed May 19, 2010 8:54 pm
liferocks wrote:From 1

(x-1)>2 or (x-1)<-2
or x>3 or x<-1...not sufficient

From 2
(x-2)>3 or (x-2)<-3

or x>5 or x<-1..not sufficient

combining
x<-1...sufficient

Ans option C
IMO E

combining statements I and II

x<-1 or x>5

so E

plz correct me if am wrong
Aiming High
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 pm
krazy800 wrote:
liferocks wrote:From 1

(x-1)>2 or (x-1)<-2
or x>3 or x<-1...not sufficient

From 2
(x-2)>3 or (x-2)<-3

or x>5 or x<-1..not sufficient

combining
x<-1...sufficient

Ans option C
IMO E

combining statements I and II

x<-1 or x>5

so E

plz correct me if am wrong
hmm..agree with E.I have edited the post.Thanks for pointing out.
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by Rafter » Thu May 20, 2010 1:20 pm
It should be D . OA please.
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Fri May 21, 2010 10:26 am
Statement (1): (x-1)^2 > 4.
for the square of the left side to be more than 4, what's inside the parentheses must be greater than 2 (meaning x must be greater than 3) or what's inside the parentheses must be less than -2 (meaning x is smaller than -1). Because x is positive, the 2nd possibility is invalid and x must be greater than 3. (1) is sufficient.

Statement (2) can be solved in a very similar way and also found sufficient.

Answer is D. This is QID 1475

-Patrick
Join the discussion

by kel2010 » Fri May 21, 2010 1:52 pm
ans should be D.

for statement I all values above 3 give desired result
for statement II all vales above 5 give desired result.
Join the discussion

by nicajvch » Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 am
Why wouldnt it be the same for number less than -3?
Join the discussion

by T11 » Wed May 26, 2010 9:02 am
The Q says x is positive.

So, (x-1) cannot <= -2
ans similarly (x-2) cannot <= -3

Hence Both I & II are sufficient.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed May 26, 2010 10:40 am
tricky !!

People always miss small details like this one " x>0 " ( I too missed :()
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion