BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Paper Test - Critical Reasoning

Expert replies
by Nisha1218 » Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:27 am
A company's 2 divisions performed with remarkable consistency over the past 3 years" in each of those years, the pharmaceuticals division has accounted for roughly 20 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of profits, and the chemicals division for the balance.

Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past 3 years from the statement above?

A. Total dollar sales for each of the company's divisions have remained roughly constant.

B. The pharmaceuticals division has faced stiffer competition in its markets than has the chemicals division.

C. The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceuticals division.

D. The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remain unchanged.

E. Highly profitable products accounted for a higher percentage of the chemicals divisions's sales than of those of the pharmaceuticals division.

I thought the answer was E, but it's A. Can anyone assist why the answer is A?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by givemeanid » Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:38 am
What is the source of this question? The answer should be C.
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by Nisha1218 » Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:20 am
Oops i meant the answer is C.

Why is it C?

Source: GMAT Paper Test (Code #14/Q#10)
Join the discussion

by givemeanid » Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:27 am
Pharmaceuticals division has accounted for roughly 20 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of profits, and the chemicals division for the balance. The chemical division, therefore, accounted for 80% of the sales and 60% of the profits.

Pharma -> 20% sales, 40% profits
Chemical -> 80% sales, 60% profits

Clearly, chemical division realized lower profits per dollar of sales than the pharma division as stated by C.


E cannot be inferred because the passage does not talk about any category of products. It could be the case that profits were equally earned by the prodcuts in the chemical or pharma division but there is no way of inferring that.
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by Nisha1218 » Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:53 am
Thanks givemeanid!

I now understand why its not E, and kind of get why its C...these are the 2 answers i was debating..

but i still dont understand how you know chemical division realized lower profits per dollar of sales than the pharma division because I would've assumed higher since chemical is at 60%...

Can you explain that point?? maybe using real numbers as an example might help me since I'm a quantitative person,.,..HELP!!!
Join the discussion

by givemeanid » Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:54 pm
Pharma -> 20% sales, 40% profits
Chemical -> 80% sales, 60% profits

Lets say the revene was $200 and profits were $100 (I would LOVE to have that kind of profit margin in real life!)

So, Pharma has $40 (20% of $200) in sales and $40 in profit (40% of $100)
Chemical has $160 in revenue and $60 in profit.
Profit per dollar for Pharma = 40/40 = 1 which is > than 60/160 for Chemical.

Even if you change the profits to be $50 instead of $100 and keep the revenue same, you get profit per dollar for pharma = 20/40 = 1/2 > 30/160 for chemical.

Play around with some more numbers for sales and profit and you would get the hang of it.
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by samanthaJ79 » Fri May 13, 2016 3:08 am
I would go for C as well. It seems the best and safest among the rest
Join the discussion