BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

GMAT Modifiers

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:22 am
gmat740 wrote: It can mean

1. Fossils of the arm of sloth
2. Sloth.

So this makes the situation confusing.
But IMO it cannot refer to fossils....fossils is plural....and it cannot refer to arm....because arm cannot be mammal...

Please tell what I am missing here.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pmFollowed by: 17 members
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:57 am
Fossils of the arm of sloth

Players of the Team

So, we talk about a collection of fossils of the arm.

I hope now it is clear
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by ketkoag » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:43 am
Agree with D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:23 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:
gmat740 wrote: It can mean

1. Fossils of the arm of sloth
2. Sloth.

So this makes the situation confusing.
But IMO it cannot refer to fossils....fossils is plural....and it cannot refer to arm....because arm cannot be mammal...

Please tell what I am missing here.
fossil cant be a mammal. only the sloth can. "making it the earliest known mammal"=>it is the earliest known mammal=>"it" is in subjective case.
"fossils of sloth". sloth is in objective case as it is after a preposition "of". "it" cannot refer to sloth in the sentence as is (though it ideally should). "it" refers to fossils which does not make sense as fossils cannot be a mammal.
D clears the confusion by bringing in "sloth" in place of "it"
also A says: the fossils ...made itself the earliest known mammal. illogical
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:48 am
Thanked: 1 times

by varundaga05 » Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:54 am
Th e subject of the sentence is the plural fossils,
not sloth, and therefore requires a plural verb. It
therefore does not have a singular antecedent.
To clarify the identifi cation of the oldest known
mammal, the noun the sloth must be explicitly
identifi ed.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:41 pm

by Shalabh7 » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:35 am
Option D cannot be correct because 'found in ' without were/was preceding it, ends up meaning that fossils were found there throughout the year. Also, have been is wrong.

In option C this is singular and so can only refer to a singular noun which happens to be sloth. But, I agree it would have been better if they would have used ' the sloth'. However, Option C is the best option.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:36 pm

by Pal22 » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:00 am
Dear Sir/Madam, how is 'found in Puerto Rico in 1981' modifying 'Fossils' and not 'the arm of a sloth' or even 'sloth'?

In such sentences (type X of Y, modifier) how can we judge which noun is getting modified?

Please suggest.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked