Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Modifiers

Expert replies

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:22 am
gmat740 wrote: It can mean

1. Fossils of the arm of sloth
2. Sloth.

So this makes the situation confusing.
But IMO it cannot refer to fossils....fossils is plural....and it cannot refer to arm....because arm cannot be mammal...

Please tell what I am missing here.
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:57 am
Fossils of the arm of sloth

Players of the Team

So, we talk about a collection of fossils of the arm.

I hope now it is clear
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:43 am
Agree with D
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:23 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:
gmat740 wrote: It can mean

1. Fossils of the arm of sloth
2. Sloth.

So this makes the situation confusing.
But IMO it cannot refer to fossils....fossils is plural....and it cannot refer to arm....because arm cannot be mammal...

Please tell what I am missing here.
fossil cant be a mammal. only the sloth can. "making it the earliest known mammal"=>it is the earliest known mammal=>"it" is in subjective case.
"fossils of sloth". sloth is in objective case as it is after a preposition "of". "it" cannot refer to sloth in the sentence as is (though it ideally should). "it" refers to fossils which does not make sense as fossils cannot be a mammal.
D clears the confusion by bringing in "sloth" in place of "it"
also A says: the fossils ...made itself the earliest known mammal. illogical
Join the discussion

by varundaga05 » Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:54 am
Th e subject of the sentence is the plural fossils,
not sloth, and therefore requires a plural verb. It
therefore does not have a singular antecedent.
To clarify the identifi cation of the oldest known
mammal, the noun the sloth must be explicitly
identifi ed.
Join the discussion

by Shalabh7 » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:35 am
Option D cannot be correct because 'found in ' without were/was preceding it, ends up meaning that fossils were found there throughout the year. Also, have been is wrong.

In option C this is singular and so can only refer to a singular noun which happens to be sloth. But, I agree it would have been better if they would have used ' the sloth'. However, Option C is the best option.
Join the discussion

by Pal22 » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:00 am
Dear Sir/Madam, how is 'found in Puerto Rico in 1981' modifying 'Fossils' and not 'the arm of a sloth' or even 'sloth'?

In such sentences (type X of Y, modifier) how can we judge which noun is getting modified?

Please suggest.
Join the discussion