BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAPrep - modifier starting with "with"

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

GMAPrep - modifier starting with "with"

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu May 05, 2011 9:30 am
Despite there being no fundamental difference in shipbuilding traditions in Viking-Age Scandinavia from the ones in other parts of Northern Europe, archaeological evidence shows that Viking ships were lighter, slimmer, faster, and thus probably more seaworthy than the heavier vessels used by the English at that time.
A. Despite there being no fundamental difference in shipbuilding traditions in Viking-Age Scandinavia from the ones
B. Despite no fundamental difference between the shipbuilding traditions in Viking-Age Scandinavia from those
C. With shipbuilding traditions in Viking-Age Scandinavia not fundamentally different from those
D. With the shipbuilding traditions in Viking-Age Scandinavia having no fundamental difference from the ones
E. Although shipbuilding traditions in Viking-Age Scandinavia were not fundamentally different from those

OA is E

Why C and D are wrong ? What role these modifiers in these answer choices are playing ?
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Thu May 05, 2011 10:29 am
Hey GMATMadeEasy,

Great question - and honestly I think you were incredibly close to answering your own question with the title of this thread and your question "what role is the modifier playing".

The modifier here has to describe the noun that immediately follows it. And that noun is "archaeological evidence".

C and D are both modifiers that start with the word "with", suggesting that the noun - "archaeological evidence" - possesses ("with") whatever is in the modifier. But archeological evidence didn't do anything "with shipbuilding traditions". It was the Vikings that possessed those shipbuilding traditions, so "with" is an illogical modifier.

E changes the game - because it has its own subject and verb:

"Although traditions were not different..."

It's not a modifier, but instead its own introductory clause. So E isn't beholden to the fact that its contents must belong to the archaeological evidence. That's how it's different and, therefore, correct.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu May 05, 2011 12:18 pm
@Brian@VeritasPrep: Thanks Brian. You told me what I wanted to hear. Feel better. I wanted to be sure of logic I had thought of earlier.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Thu May 05, 2011 5:23 pm
also one more thng, correct me if im wrong.
the sentence needs to introduce some sort of contrast, X is no differnet from Y but still X dis have some advantage.
With is not doing that here, is it?
With would have been right, if it said, With X not different from Y, both were used by Z...so on.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:43 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by cyrwr1 » Sat May 07, 2011 1:42 pm
Can someone explain to me why E>C? I must be missing something
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by voodoo_child » Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:45 pm
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Hey GMATMadeEasy,

Great question - and honestly I think you were incredibly close to answering your own question with the title of this thread and your question "what role is the modifier playing".

The modifier here has to describe the noun that immediately follows it. And that noun is "archaeological evidence".

C and D are both modifiers that start with the word "with", suggesting that the noun - "archaeological evidence" - possesses ("with") whatever is in the modifier. But archeological evidence didn't do anything "with shipbuilding traditions". It was the Vikings that possessed those shipbuilding traditions, so "with" is an illogical modifier.

E changes the game - because it has its own subject and verb:

"Although traditions were not different..."

It's not a modifier, but instead its own introductory clause. So E isn't beholden to the fact that its contents must belong to the archaeological evidence. That's how it's different and, therefore, correct.
What's wrong with a) ? Any help is greatly appreciated. (I know that GMAT doesnt like Being...but is a) grammatically correct in terms of ".....difference in X from in Y ?"
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1