BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Given the current economic climate, universal healthcare is an impossibility in the United States. More than half of

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Feb 17, 2021 5:07 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Given the current economic climate, universal healthcare is an impossibility in the United States. More than half of all U.S. households report feeling overwhelmed by expenses, and many people are struggling to find additional sources of income. Funding such a massive program would require significant tax increases, adding to the financial burden of many individuals. The employer-sponsored healthcare system currently in place keeps taxes low, protecting our nation’s economy.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. Many U.S. citizens enjoy sizeable tax breaks for medical expenses.

B. Universal healthcare would reduce the financial burden on employers, resulting in significant job growth and wage increases.

C. A majority of profitable, private health insurers have indicated that they expect to increase their payrolls in the coming quarter.

D. Pharmaceutical companies have fewer incentives to innovate new drugs in a universal healthcare system.

E. Most U.S. citizens depend on their employers for health coverage and could not afford comparable coverage under the current system.


OA B

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

What this argument says is that universal healthcare is impossible to achieve in the United States because it will require significant tax increases that will, in turn, increase the financial burden of individuals. On the other hand, the current employer sponsoring the system keeps taxes low.

So, in other to weaken the argument, you have to find the option that strengthens the point that universal healthcare will be financially beneficial.

Option A - incorrect
This is not true because the passage strengthens the current argument that the current employer sponsors the healthcare system.

Option B - correct
This weakens the argument because it supports the universal healthcare system instead of the current employers.

Option C - incorrect
It is wrong because it goes out of point. The passage argument doesn't talk about an increase in payrolls or the likes.

Option D - incorrect
This is also outside the scope of the argument. This is not concerned about pharmaceutical companies.

Option E - incorrect
This claim strengthens the argument because it doesn't address the benefits of the universal healthcare system.
Join the discussion