BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Attorney

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 2 times
by vikram_k51 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:33 am
692. The attorney turned down the law firm's offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.

(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

OA C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:53 pm
Location: Gurgaon
Thanked: 1 times

by rookiez » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:30 am
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
Promoting what??
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
Promoting what??
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
Parallel verbs meant and did not reflect
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
similar to E
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment
Wordy, appositive phrase makes sentence fragment
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:20 pm

by agautam7879 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:53 pm
no reflecting is a participle modifier and is modifying the it which is the subject of the clause next to the participle modifier and hence I am still confused between C and D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pmFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 99 times

by vk_vinayak » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:59 pm
agautam7879 wrote:no reflecting is a participle modifier and is modifying the it which is the subject of the clause next to the participle modifier and hence I am still confused between C and D
I understand your question, but I think C looks better.

We can see that COMMA + ING is modifying the sub-clause it (the law firm's offer of a position) was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota, but technically it could refer to the entire proceeding clause (The attorney ... quota). Hence I believe C is better.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 578
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:00 pmFollowed by: 62 members
Thanked: 136 times

by KapTeacherEli » Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:53 pm
vk_vinayak wrote:
agautam7879 wrote:no reflecting is a participle modifier and is modifying the it which is the subject of the clause next to the participle modifier and hence I am still confused between C and D
I understand your question, but I think C looks better.

We can see that COMMA + ING is modifying the sub-clause it (the law firm's offer of a position) was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota, but technically it could refer to the entire proceeding clause (The attorney ... quota). Hence I believe C is better.
Good summary, and that's absolutely correct. The "not reflecting" doesn't clearly modify what it's meant to modify. It MIGHT modify the right thing, but the construction is so awkward that it just might not. (C) doesn't require any sort of interpretations--it clearly means what it's meant to mean, so it's the stylistically superior choice.
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1