BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Attorney

Expert replies
by vikram_k51 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:33 am
692. The attorney turned down the law firm's offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.

(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rookiez » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:30 am
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
Promoting what??
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
Promoting what??
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
Parallel verbs meant and did not reflect
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
similar to E
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment
Wordy, appositive phrase makes sentence fragment
Join the discussion

by agautam7879 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:53 pm
no reflecting is a participle modifier and is modifying the it which is the subject of the clause next to the participle modifier and hence I am still confused between C and D
Join the discussion

by vk_vinayak » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:59 pm
agautam7879 wrote:no reflecting is a participle modifier and is modifying the it which is the subject of the clause next to the participle modifier and hence I am still confused between C and D
I understand your question, but I think C looks better.

We can see that COMMA + ING is modifying the sub-clause it (the law firm's offer of a position) was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota, but technically it could refer to the entire proceeding clause (The attorney ... quota). Hence I believe C is better.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Join the discussion

by KapTeacherEli » Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:53 pm
vk_vinayak wrote:
agautam7879 wrote:no reflecting is a participle modifier and is modifying the it which is the subject of the clause next to the participle modifier and hence I am still confused between C and D
I understand your question, but I think C looks better.

We can see that COMMA + ING is modifying the sub-clause it (the law firm's offer of a position) was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota, but technically it could refer to the entire proceeding clause (The attorney ... quota). Hence I believe C is better.
Good summary, and that's absolutely correct. The "not reflecting" doesn't clearly modify what it's meant to modify. It MIGHT modify the right thing, but the construction is so awkward that it just might not. (C) doesn't require any sort of interpretations--it clearly means what it's meant to mean, so it's the stylistically superior choice.
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1