BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

geometry2

Expert replies
by Gurpinder » Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:55 am
Image

[spoiler]can someone please explain how you would calculate the area of the rectangle.

i understand that the width is 6. [/spoiler]
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by euro » Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:08 am
Gurpinder wrote:Image

[spoiler]can someone please explain how you would calculate the area of the rectangle.

i understand that the width is 6. [/spoiler]

Dia of circle = 16 = WY
Therefore, radius = OW = 8
This is sufficient to find area of circle. We need to determine if area of rectangle can be computer or not

Statement (1) WZ=OW
OW = radius of circle = 8 = OZ
Therefore, Triangle OWZ is equilateral with side = 8. Hence rectangle WXYZ is a square whose side = 8.
Statement (1) is SUFFICIENT

Statement (2) doesn't tell us anything about the dimensions of rectangle and is INSUFFICIENT

Answer is option (A) statement (1) alone is sufficient
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Fri Sep 17, 2010 12:18 pm
nice work,
Join the discussion

by sumit.sinha » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:01 am
euro wrote:
Gurpinder wrote:Image

[spoiler]can someone please explain how you would calculate the area of the rectangle.

i understand that the width is 6. [/spoiler]

Dia of circle = 16 = WY
Therefore, radius = OW = 8
This is sufficient to find area of circle. We need to determine if area of rectangle can be computer or not

Statement (1) WZ=OW
OW = radius of circle = 8 = OZ
Therefore, Triangle OWZ is equilateral with side = 8. Hence rectangle WXYZ is a square whose side = 8.
Statement (1) is SUFFICIENT

Statement (2) doesn't tell us anything about the dimensions of rectangle and is INSUFFICIENT

Answer is option (A) statement (1) alone is sufficient
@Euro - from Statement (1) rectangle WXYZ is not a square whose side = 8. Rectangle WXYZ has sides 8 and 8rt3.
But still Statement (1) is sufficient and (2) isn't. So Answer is (A).
Cheers,
Sumit
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:45 am
euro wrote: Dia of circle = 16 = WY
Therefore, radius = OW = 8
This is sufficient to find area of circle. We need to determine if area of rectangle can be computer or not

Statement (1) WZ=OW
OW = radius of circle = 8 = OZ
Therefore, Triangle OWZ is equilateral with side = 8. Hence rectangle WXYZ is a square whose side = 8.
Statement (1) is SUFFICIENT

Statement (2) doesn't tell us anything about the dimensions of rectangle and is INSUFFICIENT

Answer is option (A) statement (1) alone is sufficient
I see that (B) is not sufficient. I can also follow you up the point where you get 2 of the sides of the triangle to be 8. But how does this help you calculate the area of the rectangle? I am not sure about that!

Please explain!
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:07 am
I see that (B) is not sufficient. I can also follow you up the point where you get 2 of the sides of the triangle to be 8. But how does this help you calculate the area of the rectangle? I am not sure about that!
Please explain
Just as folks above have pointed out already ,you know that OW = OZ = WZ .. You know the diameter XZ = 16 which is nothing but 2 OZ because in a rectangle the diagnols bisect each other ... So you have OW = OZ = WZ = 8 (since 2 OZ = 8)
Since you have found XZ and WZ , you can find the area of triangle XZW ... also in rectangle , area(XZY) = area (XYZ) because diagnol cuts the rectangle into 2 triangles of same area... So basically you can find the area of the complete rectangle....

You can also find the area of the circle because you have the diameter

so rea of shaded region = area of circle - area of rectangle....So , finally , you can determine the area of the shaded region
@Deb
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:12 am
debmalya_dutta wrote:
I see that (B) is not sufficient. I can also follow you up the point where you get 2 of the sides of the triangle to be 8. But how does this help you calculate the area of the rectangle? I am not sure about that!
Please explain
Just as folks above have pointed out already ,you know that OW = OZ = WZ .. You know the diameter XZ = 16 which is nothing but 2 OZ because in a rectangle the diagnols bisect each other ... So you have OW = OZ = WZ = 8 (since 2 OZ = 8)
Since you have found XZ and WZ , you can find the area of triangle XZW ... also in rectangle , area(XZY) = area (XYZ) because diagnol cuts the rectangle into 2 triangles of same area... So basically you can find the area of the complete rectangle....

You can also find the area of the circle because you have the diameter

so rea of shaded region = area of circle - area of rectangle....So , finally , you can determine the area of the shaded region
Thx Deb. I was thinking about the diagonal as well.

So if we were to find the actual area, since we have hypotenuse = 16 and one side = 8, we would use the p. theorem to find the third side right? and then calculate the area, and then double that area and that would be the area for the rectangle?

What would you say would be the difficulty lvl of this question?
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:29 am
@gurpinder - no idea :) I am still getting a grasp of the whole GMAT thing..
@Deb
Join the discussion

by sumit.sinha » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:37 am

What would you say would be the difficulty lvl of this question?
500-600 level or maybe 600-700, but definitely not 700-800 :P
Cheers,
Sumit
Join the discussion

by euro » Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:01 am
sumit.sinha wrote: @Euro - from Statement (1) rectangle WXYZ is not a square whose side = 8. Rectangle WXYZ has sides 8 and 8rt3.
But still Statement (1) is sufficient and (2) isn't. So Answer is (A).
@ Sumit
Thanks for correcting me. The rectangle WXYZ is actually not a square. Had it been a square, then the triangle would not have been an equilateral triangle. :)
Join the discussion