BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

2^(4-1)^2

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by hwiya320 » Sat Aug 01, 2009 12:59 pm
do what's in the parenthesis first, then you have 2^3^2 over 2^1

or 2^ (3^2) which equals to 2^9 / 2^1 which equals to 2^8.

you're multiplying 3 with 2, rather than squaring the 3.
Time to beat the GMAT again.
Join the discussion

by alexdallas » Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:05 pm
got it.

completely missed the parantheses.
Join the discussion

by polarbear222 » Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:25 pm
this one tripped me up to. i still don't really understand what the difference is between:

4^(3)^2 and (4^3)^2

so in the first its 4^9 and second its 4^6? i'm not sure why this doesn't make sense to me. what is the order of operations rule i am missing?
Join the discussion

by alexdallas » Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:27 pm
its PEMBAS.

parantheses- always come first.
so if you do the parantheses, that's (4-1)squared, which is 3squared, which is 9.
Join the discussion

by nk_81 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:48 am
I seek clarification....

as per the attachment 2^(4-1)^2 is different from (2^(4-1))^2 ...right? The answer of the latter is going to be 2^5...is it?
NK
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:30 am
nk_81 wrote:I seek clarification....

as per the attachment 2^(4-1)^2 is different from (2^(4-1))^2 ...right? The answer of the latter is going to be 2^5...is it?
Yes, you're correct.

2^[(4 - 1)^2] = 2^9 ...... BUT ...... [2^(4 - 1)]^2 = 2^6
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by nk_81 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:36 am
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
nk_81 wrote:I seek clarification....

as per the attachment 2^(4-1)^2 is different from (2^(4-1))^2 ...right? The answer of the latter is going to be 2^5...is it?
Yes, you're correct.

2^[(4 - 1)^2] = 2^9 ...... BUT ...... [2^(4 - 1)]^2 = 2^6
In this case, we just need to watch out for the parathesis then. The position of the parathesis will decide the solution for such questions. Right?
NK
Join the discussion

by RyanP » Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:10 pm
Why do you just automatically take out the parenthesis after doing 4-1. Shouldn't it still be 2^(3)^2?
Join the discussion

by RyanP » Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:11 pm
RyanP wrote:Why do you just automatically take out the parenthesis after doing 4-1. Shouldn't it still be 2^(3)^2?
Anybody?
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:55 pm
RyanP wrote:Why do you just automatically take out the parenthesis after doing 4-1. Shouldn't it still be 2^(3)^2?
Yes, it should be.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by RyanP » Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:34 am
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:
RyanP wrote:Why do you just automatically take out the parenthesis after doing 4-1. Shouldn't it still be 2^(3)^2?
Yes, it should be.
If it should be that, then why is the answer 2^8 rather than 2^5? OG has it as 2^8
Join the discussion

by seal4913 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:46 am
RyanP wrote:
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:
RyanP wrote:Why do you just automatically take out the parenthesis after doing 4-1. Shouldn't it still be 2^(3)^2?
Yes, it should be.
If it should be that, then why is the answer 2^8 rather than 2^5? OG has it as 2^8
2^(3)^2, the parenthesis is 3^2 which is 9 and gives (2^9)/(2^1) which is still 2^8
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:10 pm
^Exactly. The parentheses tell us which base to raise to its exponent first.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by KateG1302 » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:10 pm
Hi all,

sorry to dig this thread out again. I am not 100% clear on how the rules are with regards to exponents of exponents - I thought it was always just a question of multiplying them (ie 2^4^3 = 2^12) but now it seems that the rules have changed.

I don't quite understand where the brackets have to be to do the 3^2 in this case instead of 3*2. It would be great if someone could explain WHEN to use ^ and when *.

I kind of got from the previous explanation that when the exponent and its exponent (in this case: (4-1)^2) are in brackets, then I need to do ^ - i.e. 3^2. And if the base is in a bracket with the "first exponent" (in this case: 2^(4-1)) then I need to multiply the first and the second exponent (ie (4-1)^2 = 3*2).

Is this always the rule? Can someone confirm if I'm right here please?

Thanks in advance!

Kate
Join the discussion