BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

From GMAT Prep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by g_beatthegmat » Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:50 am
Should be (A).

From (A), we know that both x and y are prime numbers. Also, we already know that except number 2, all prime numbers are odd.

We have two cases now -

(i) Either both x and y are equal (not mentioned in the question so can not assume that they're not)
In this case, either both are 2, or non-2 prime numbers. In both the cases, x(y+1) = even.

(ii) Both x and y are not equal
In this case, if one is 2, then automatically x(y+1) = even. If both are non-2 prime numbers, then ODD*(ODD+1) = ODD*EVEN = EVEN.

Thus (a) is sufficient.


(b) is in sufficient because it doesn't tell anything about x.

Hope it helps.
Join the discussion

by Motherjane » Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:56 am
Hi atlantic,

First let us look at the problem statement.
x(y+1) is even or not?

We know that Even * Even = Even
or Even * odd = Even

So in this case we have the following conditions:

1) X is even and Y +1 is even
which means X is even and Y is odd
or
2) X is even and Y+1 is odd
which means X is even and Y is even
or
3) Y+1 is even and X is odd
which means Y is odd and X is odd

Coming to statement 1:
x & y are prime numbers.
All prime numbers are odd except 2.

So even if X is 2 and Y is any other odd number
or X&Y are both odd numbers, we know that X(Y+1) is even. Hence sufficient. AD

Statement 2:
y>7

Nothing abt x. Also we dont know whether y is even or odd.
Hence insufficient.

Answer (A).

Hope this is correct.
Join the discussion

by atlantic » Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:59 am
Thanks g_beatthegmat.

(A) was my choice also, but unfortunately not correct.

I'll post OA later. Anybody else?
Join the discussion

by vinod_ece66 » Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:24 am
Is the answer C

a) x and y prime numbers
the product can be both even or odd
for even x= 2 y=3
for odd y=2 x=3
so not sufficient
b) y>7
for even x=2 y=8
for odd x =3 y=9
not sufficient

however combining both we can say the y+1 term is always going to be

even.

hence even*even =even
or odd*even = even
Join the discussion

by g_beatthegmat » Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:31 am
Yes, I think vinod_ece66 is right. I overlooked the case when y could be = 2 and x non-2 prime.

C it is.
Join the discussion

by atlantic » Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:37 am
OA is C.

Now I understand my mistakes. There is only one way that x(y+1) can be odd with prime numbers, and that is when x=3 and y=2. All the others are obviously even. GMAT can be tricky.

Thanks guys.
Join the discussion

by Motherjane » Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:45 am
Thats correct!!

Haven't thought on these lines....

It is (C).

Thanks to all of ya.
Join the discussion