Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

From GMAT online practice Exam

Expert replies
by achandwa » Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:58 am
From the information provided in the question here're several possibilities:
1. a=2, b=2 => (-a,b) = -2, 2 & (-b,a) = -2, 2 - valid since the points fall in same quadrant - IInd
2. a=-2, b=2 => (-a, b) = 2,2 & (-b,a) = -2, -2 - invalid since the points fall in different quadrant
3. a=2, b=-2 => (-a, b) = -2,-2 & (-b,a) = 2, 2 - invalid since the points fall in different quadrant
4. a=-2, b=-2 => (-a,b) = 2,-2 & (-b,a) = 2, -2 - valid since the points fall in same quadrant - IVth

From the information above you know that (-a,b) and (-b,a) are either in IInd or IVth quadrant

Now consider the data
i) xy > 0 merely says that x and y are both +ve or both -ve. This means that the point (-x, y) falls either in IInd quadrant or IVth quadrant - Insufficient on its own

ii) ax>0 merely tells the same thing. either a and x are both +ve or both -ve. That again means (-x,y) falls either in IInd or IVth quadrant - Insufficient on its own

But combining i) and ii) there are two possibilities
1) (-a, b) and (-b,a) are in IInd quadrant,
a must be +ve and from ii) x is +ve; so from i) y should be +ve too. Thus (-x, y) lies in IInd quadrant

2) (-a, b) and (-b,a) are in IVth quadrant,
a must be -ve and from ii) x is -ve; so from i) y should be -ve too. Thus (-x, y) lies in IVth quadrant.

Was a tough one. I had to scratch my head hard!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |