BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

From GMAT online practice Exam

Expert replies
by achandwa » Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:58 am
From the information provided in the question here're several possibilities:
1. a=2, b=2 => (-a,b) = -2, 2 & (-b,a) = -2, 2 - valid since the points fall in same quadrant - IInd
2. a=-2, b=2 => (-a, b) = 2,2 & (-b,a) = -2, -2 - invalid since the points fall in different quadrant
3. a=2, b=-2 => (-a, b) = -2,-2 & (-b,a) = 2, 2 - invalid since the points fall in different quadrant
4. a=-2, b=-2 => (-a,b) = 2,-2 & (-b,a) = 2, -2 - valid since the points fall in same quadrant - IVth

From the information above you know that (-a,b) and (-b,a) are either in IInd or IVth quadrant

Now consider the data
i) xy > 0 merely says that x and y are both +ve or both -ve. This means that the point (-x, y) falls either in IInd quadrant or IVth quadrant - Insufficient on its own

ii) ax>0 merely tells the same thing. either a and x are both +ve or both -ve. That again means (-x,y) falls either in IInd or IVth quadrant - Insufficient on its own

But combining i) and ii) there are two possibilities
1) (-a, b) and (-b,a) are in IInd quadrant,
a must be +ve and from ii) x is +ve; so from i) y should be +ve too. Thus (-x, y) lies in IInd quadrant

2) (-a, b) and (-b,a) are in IVth quadrant,
a must be -ve and from ii) x is -ve; so from i) y should be -ve too. Thus (-x, y) lies in IVth quadrant.

Was a tough one. I had to scratch my head hard!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |