BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Following question falls under what type of CR question

Expert replies
by vidhya16 » Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:28 pm
Scientist: My research indicates that children who engage in impulsive behavior similar to adult thrill-seeking behavior are twice as likely as other children to have a gene variant that increases sensitivity to dopamine. From this, I conclude that there is a causal relationship between this gene variant and an inclination toward thrill-seeking behavior.

Which one of the following, if true, most calls into question the scientist's argument?

A) Many impulsive adults are not unusually sensitive to dopamine.

B) It is not possible to reliably distinguish impulsive behavior from other behavior.

C) Children are often described by adults as engaging in thrill-seeking behvaior simply because they act impulsively.

D) Many people exhibit behavioral tendencies as adults that they did not exhibit as children.

E) The gene variant studied by the scientist is correlated with other types of behavior in addition to thrill-seeking behavior.




Ta
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ldoolitt » Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:55 pm
In the question stem, replace "calls into question" with "weaken". It reads

"Which of the following, if true, most weakens the scientist's argument"

Which is obviously a weaken problem.
Join the discussion

by Tani » Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:22 pm
From another perspective, this is also a "causal" argument. The conclusion says one thing "causes" another. WIth such arguments we always first look for "overlooked" causes. In other words, if we are told that X causes Y. To weaken we should first ask whether Z causes Y. We can also ask whether Y causes x (rare), or whether the relationship is pure coincidence.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by singh181 » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:54 pm
Question Type: Weaken (Causation)

IMO E
Join the discussion

by vidhya16 » Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:23 am
Thank you guys.. I referenced this question from another website.. Answer is not posted. Sorry for inconvenience..
Last edited by vidhya16 on Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:25 am
vidhya16 wrote:Scientist: My research indicates that children who engage in impulsive behavior similar to adult thrill-seeking behavior are twice as likely as other children to have a gene variant that increases sensitivity to dopamine. From this, I conclude that there is a causal relationship between this gene variant and an inclination toward thrill-seeking behavior.

Which one of the following, if true, most calls into question the scientist's argument?

A) Many impulsive adults are not unusually sensitive to dopamine.

B) It is not possible to reliably distinguish impulsive behavior from other behavior.

C) Children are often described by adults as engaging in thrill-seeking behvaior simply because they act impulsively.

D) Many people exhibit behavioral tendencies as adults that they did not exhibit as children.

E) The gene variant studied by the scientist is correlated with other types of behavior in addition to thrill-seeking behavior.




Ta
I go with C.Nullifying the effect of gene variant
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:00 pm
B says you can't tell impulsive behavior from other behavior. If you can't tell whether behavior is impulsive or not, how can you tell whether it is correlated with a gene?
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by Asher » Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:45 am
Tani, thanks for the ans.

Could you please explain why C is not the answer
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:55 am
IMO - E.
Weaken by stating other cause of result.
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by Tani » Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:46 am
We are told that these children have impulsive behavior. It never says they are described as thrill-seeking.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion