Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Florida

Expert replies

by Target2009 » Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:12 pm
+1 D
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by manishpal » Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:35 am
awesome explanation.thankssssssss
komal wrote:
arorag wrote:In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
Incorrect : We need to compare Florida to Florida (over last ten years), not Florida with another state. Issue is about decrease in percentage of ppl moving to Florida over the last 10 yrs. Hence this one is Out of Scope.

B. The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other states has increased over the past ten years.
Incorrect : Number of ppl moving OUT of florida is irrelevant.

C. There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
Incorrect : Comparison has to be made about economic effect on those businesses catering to retirees over the last ten years.

D. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years.
Correct : The situation mentioned above can best be explained using an example :

Lets Assume that ten years back 100 people in the US moved out of state to retire
Out of 100 ppl 10% moved to florida = 10

This year 200 ppl in the US moved out of state to retire
Out of 200 ppl 7% moved to florida - 14

This year the number of ppl (14) moving to florida has increased even though percentage (less 3%) has decreased.

Answer choice (D) states just this and hence weakens the argument.


E. The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago.
Incorrect : This strengthens the argument.

Hope this helps : )
Join the discussion

by gmat_for_life » Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:19 pm
Hello David,

Could you please guide me on the below point?

If there were an option stating that a reduction in the number of people could lead to an increase in sales(fewer people buying more stuffs or increase in the prices of the already existing items), would that have weakened the argument as well?

Many thanks,
Amit
Join the discussion