ZZZ: Agreement / Disagreement (LSAT)

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:22 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

ZZZ: Agreement / Disagreement (LSAT)

by gmatusa2010 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:03 am
Kim: The rapidly growing world population is increasing demands on food producers in ways that threaten our natural resources. With more land needed for both food production and urban areas, less land will be available for forests and wildlife habitats.

Hampton: You are overlooking the promise of technology. I am confident that improvements in agriculture will allow for us to feed the world population of ten billion predicted for 2050 without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture.

Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support the claim that booth of them would agree which one of the following


B) Continued research into more-efficient agricultural practices and innovative biotechnology aimed at producing more food on less land would be beneficial.

D) In the next half century, human population growth will continue to erode wildlife habitats and diminish forests.


I put D because

1) "without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture" Implies although not significant but some increase of land devoted to agriculture will occur.

2) "Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support " It said Kim's and Hampton's statements NOT Kim or Hampton. Neither one talked about biotech. Kim just talked about land and nothing about efficiency. Although I do somewhat agree that Kim and Hampton might agree on B but their statements as present do not. Furthermore its more of a stretch then D which is explicit.


Please have input.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:10 pm
I think B is correct
gmatusa2010 wrote:Kim: The rapidly growing world population is increasing demands on food producers in ways that threaten our natural resources. With more land needed for both food production and urban areas, less land will be available for forests and wildlife habitats.

Hampton: You are overlooking the promise of technology. I am confident that improvements in agriculture will allow for us to feed the world population of ten billion predicted for 2050 without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture.

Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support the claim that booth of them would agree which one of the following


B) Continued research into more-efficient agricultural practices and innovative biotechnology aimed at producing more food on less land would be beneficial.

D) In the next half century, human population growth will continue to erode wildlife habitats and diminish forests.


I put D because

1) "without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture" Implies although not significant but some increase of land devoted to agriculture will occur.

2) "Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support " It said Kim's and Hampton's statements NOT Kim or Hampton. Neither one talked about biotech. Kim just talked about land and nothing about efficiency. Although I do somewhat agree that Kim and Hampton might agree on B but their statements as present do not. Furthermore its more of a stretch then D which is explicit.


Please have input.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:57 am
Thanked: 4 times

by rashmi.kaushal » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:43 am
What is the OA ??

B just reiterates hampton's Views !

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by Prashantbhardwaj » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:59 am
I think the answer is B.

It can be inferred from the passage that Hampton acknowledges Kim's concern for the availability of land for natural resources and wildlife. And then he suggests an effective solution.

As such B being that solution; B is what they both will agree to.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Aug 22, 2010 8:58 am
gmatusa2010 wrote:Kim: The rapidly growing world population is increasing demands on food producers in ways that threaten our natural resources. With more land needed for both food production and urban areas, less land will be available for forests and wildlife habitats.

Hampton: You are overlooking the promise of technology. I am confident that improvements in agriculture will allow for us to feed the world population of ten billion predicted for 2050 without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture.

Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support the claim that booth of them would agree which one of the following


B) Continued research into more-efficient agricultural practices and innovative biotechnology aimed at producing more food on less land would be beneficial.

D) In the next half century, human population growth will continue to erode wildlife habitats and diminish forests.


I put D because

1) "without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture" Implies although not significant but some increase of land devoted to agriculture will occur.

2) "Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support " It said Kim's and Hampton's statements NOT Kim or Hampton. Neither one talked about biotech. Kim just talked about land and nothing about efficiency. Although I do somewhat agree that Kim and Hampton might agree on B but their statements as present do not. Furthermore its more of a stretch then D which is explicit.


Please have input.
also agree that B is the answer. D is jsut what kim mentioned but in B both agree that producing more food on more land can threaten the resource