BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

fish market

Expert replies
by yangliu0401 » Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:55 pm
To meet the rapidly rising market demand for fish and seafood, suppliers are growing fish twice as fast as their natural growth rate, cutting their feed allotment by nearly half and raising them on special diets.
A the same
B their natural growth rate, their feed allotment cut
C growing them naturally, cutting their feed allotment
D they grow naturally, cutting their feed allotment
E they grow naturally, with their feed allotment cut.

OA is D. But what's wrong with C :cry:
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by satish.nagdev » Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:05 pm
I think idiomatically correct sentence would be

X runs as fast as Y does
X eats as fast as Y does

Y can be noun/pronoun

hence D



oops typo I had to write D
Last edited by satish.nagdev on Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by ssilver0210 » Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:20 pm
A seems correct.
--Sean

I provide GMAT (verbal) tutoring in NYC, and over Skype/E-mail. Please contact [email protected] for further information, or if you have any questions at all.
Join the discussion

Re: fish market

by rs2010 » Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:28 pm
yangliu0401 wrote:To meet the rapidly rising market demand for fish and seafood, suppliers are growing fish twice as fast as their natural growth rate, cutting their feed allotment by nearly half and raising them on special diets.
A the same
B their natural growth rate, their feed allotment cut
C growing them naturally, cutting their feed allotment
D they grow naturally, cutting their feed allotment
E they grow naturally, with their feed allotment cut.

OA is D. But what's wrong with C :cry:
IMO D. 'Growing them' makes sentence passive. Growing should follow cutting so 'D'
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sun May 23, 2010 12:17 am
opening an old thread..pls bear it.
B and E are out as we need cutting for ||ism with growing ..., cutting ....and raising

On either side of ...X twice as fast as Y.., we need similar elements.

In original sentence we have:
are growing fish[VERB Construct] twice as fast as their natural growth rate[NO VERB] - Is this why its wrong ??

I have one more doubt,
Since D is correct option. THEY should refer to FISH. However, FISH is object in Clause - suppliers are growing fish. So, can a Subject pronoun refer to object in previous clause. I think ideally, Subject pronouns should refer back to subject of the previous clause i.e. suppliers.

Pls help me with this.
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1