BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Finding premises and conclusion

Expert replies
by sureng » Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:15 am
Q: Extinction is a process that can depend on a variety of ecological, geographical, and physiological variables. These variables affect different species of organisms in different ways, and should, therefore, yield a random pattern of extinctions. However, the fossil record shows that extinction occurs in a surprisingly definite pattern, with many species vanishing at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, forms the best basis for at least a partial explanation of the patterned extinctions revealed by the fossil record?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Folks, i am trying to separate premises(P1,P2) and conclusion(C).

P1: Extinction depends on Eco,Geo & phys variables.
P2: P1 affects different organisms in different ways.

C: P1 & P2 leads to Random pattern of extinctions.

Counter Premise: fossil records show extinction in definite pattern

At this point after reading question stem i assume the above question as weaken conclusion type?

Did i arrived at the correct conclusion??
Pls. clarify..Should i just focus on question stem or do i need to focus on conclusion?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by hey_thr67 » Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:33 am
To me it seems a paradox question. But the answer has to have a negative explanation instead of a positive one.Paradox questions often miss the link which we can observe here.

So the question is combination of the following,

1- Paradox question
2- Odd-one out.
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:49 pm
This one is definitely a paradox question.

No weaken question, or strengthen for that matter will ever ask you to form an "explanation" the only thing that needs to be explained is a paradox.

With a paradox question there is no conclusion. There are two sides to the paradox. One side will not require much explanation (or else the argument will give you the basis for that explanation.

The other side of the paradox will not yet be explained - often the question stem will mention that this is what needs to be explained.

The two sides are usually separated by a transition word, in this case the word "however" is used.

The first part of the paradox - the part that is already explained in the argument leads to the idea that there should be "a random pattern of extinctions."

The part of the paradox that needs to be explained is the fact that the fossil record yields a "surprisingly definite pattern of extinctions." The question stem also mentions the second part as the part that needs to be explained. The correct answer will give a reason why the pattern of extinctions is definite and not random.

Hope that helps
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by sureng » Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:58 pm
Thanks David. Excellent explanation and now i know what paradox means. I reread the paradox pattern in the CR book i have.
Join the discussion