• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## Finding a conclusion ##### This topic has 1 expert reply and 2 member replies ## Finding a conclusion Economist: During a recession, a company can cut personnel costs either by laying off some employees without reducing the wages of remaining employees or by reducing the wages of all employees without laying off anyone. Both damage morale, but layoffs damage it less, since the aggrieved have, after all, left. Thus, when companies must reduce personnel costs during recessions, they are likely to lay off employees. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the economistâ€™s reasoning? A) Employee morale is usually the primary concern driving companiesâ€™ decisions about whether to lay off employees or to reduce their wages. B) In general, companies increase wages only when they are unable to find enough qualified employees. C) Some companies will be unable to make a profit during recessions no matter how much they reduce personnel costs. D) When companies cut personnel costs during recessions by reducing wages, some employees usually resign. E) Some companies that have laid off employees during recessions have had difficulty finding enough qualified employees once economic growth resumed. I believe the economist's conclusion is :- To reduce personnel costs during recessions, companies are likely to lay off employees Supporting statements from premise:- layoffs damage morale less, since the aggrieved employees have, after all, left. Addnl Info :- a company can cut personnel costs either by laying off some employees without reducing the wages of remaining employees or by reducing the wages of all employees without laying off anyone. Now can someone explain why is D incorrect ? And also why A is better over D ? Legendary Member Joined 03 Feb 2014 Posted: 2063 messages Followed by: 133 members Upvotes: 955 GMAT Score: 800 prachi18oct wrote: Economist: During a recession, a company can cut personnel costs either by laying off some employees without reducing the wages of remaining employees or by reducing the wages of all employees without laying off anyone. Both damage morale, but layoffs damage it less, since the aggrieved have, after all, left. Thus, when companies must reduce personnel costs during recessions, they are likely to lay off employees. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the economistâ€™s reasoning? A) Employee morale is usually the primary concern driving companiesâ€™ decisions about whether to lay off employees or to reduce their wages. B) In general, companies increase wages only when they are unable to find enough qualified employees. C) Some companies will be unable to make a profit during recessions no matter how much they reduce personnel costs. D) When companies cut personnel costs during recessions by reducing wages, some employees usually resign. E) Some companies that have laid off employees during recessions have had difficulty finding enough qualified employees once economic growth resumed. I believe the economist's conclusion is :- To reduce personnel costs during recessions, companies are likely to lay off employees Supporting statements from premise:- layoffs damage morale less, since the aggrieved employees have, after all, left. Addnl Info :- a company can cut personnel costs either by laying off some employees without reducing the wages of remaining employees or by reducing the wages of all employees without laying off anyone. Now can someone explain why is D incorrect ? And also why A is better over D ? D is just not all that supportive of the conclusion. Ok, sure, maybe companies would prefer not to see employees resign in response to wage reductions. So maybe that would support the conclusion that they will use layoffs instead. Having said that, it's possible that they don't even really care if a few people resign. There is not really an indication one way or the other. A, on the other hand, clearly states that their primary concern when choosing between the two methods of reducing personnel costs is morale. So, if true, that would strengthen the conclusion that they will use the method that is best for morale, which is layoffs. _________________ Marty Murray GMAT Coach m.w.murray@hotmail.com https://infinitemindprep.com/ In Person in the New York Area and Online Worldwide ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15023 messages Followed by: 1859 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Quote: During a recession, a company can cut personnel costs either by laying off some employees without reducing the wages of remaining employees or by reducing the wages of all employees without laying off anyone. Both damage morale, but layoffs damage it less, since the aggrieved have, after all, left. Thus, when companies must reduce personnel costs during recessions, they are likely to lay off employees. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the economistâ€™s reasoning? I received a PM asking me to comment. Conclusion: When companies must reduce personnel costs during recessions, they are likely to lay off employees. Premise: Laying off employees will not damage morale as much as would reducing wages. This argument exhibits a common flaw: a shift in language between the premise and the conclusion. The premise is about morale; the conclusion is about laying off employees. The argument assumes that these two concepts are intrinsically connected: that morale is the primary concern when deciding whether to lay off employees. The correct answer choice will strengthen the link between morale and lay-offs. It will show that these two ideas are intrinsically connected (or it will eliminate other factors that a company might consider when deciding whether to lay off employees.) (A) Employee morale is usually the primary concern driving companiesâ€™ decisions about whether to lay off employees or to reduce their wages. Correct. This answer choice connects morale to the decision about whether to lay off employees. (B) In general, companies increase wages only when they are unable to find enough qualified employees. Outside the scope. The argument is not about increasing wages. Eliminate B. (C) Some companies will be unable to make a profit during recessions no matter how much they reduce personnel costs. Outside the scope. The argument is not about making a profit. Also, when answering a strengthen/weaken question, avoid the word some. Some could be as few as one or two. Such a small number would have too small an effect on the argument. Eliminate C. (D) When companies cut personnel costs during recessions by reducing wages, some employees usually resign. This answer choice could weaken the conclusion. The argument claims that the advantage of laying off employees is that the disgruntled employees will no longer work at the company, so morale will be less damaged. If reducing wages has the same effect -- if it also causes disgruntled employees to leave -- then the argument cannot claim that laying off employees will cause less damage to morale. Also, when answering a strengthen/weaken question, avoid the word some. Some employees could be as few as one or two. Such a small number would have too small an effect on the argument. Eliminate D. (E) Some companies that have laid off employees during recessions have had difficulty finding enough qualified employees once economic growth resumed. Outside the scope. The argument is only about what happens during a recession. Also, when answering a strengthen/weaken question, avoid the word some. Some could be as few as one or two. Such a small number would have too small an effect on the argument. Eliminate E. The correct answer is A. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 27 Apr 2014 Posted: 269 messages Followed by: 5 members Upvotes: 8 Thankyou GMATGuruNY for the detailed approach! Perfect! • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for \$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Jay@ManhattanReview 66 first replies
2 fskilnik@GMATH 50 first replies
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow 49 first replies
4 GMATGuruNY 32 first replies
5 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma... 26 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 fskilnik@GMATH

GMATH Teacher

109 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

97 posts
3 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

94 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

83 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

78 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts