BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

find this Q tough

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Fri May 27, 2011 8:10 am
Allowing employees to work remotely is widely accepted as environmentally friendly and cost-saving as compared to requiring employees to work on site during normal business hours. Moreover, the current work-from-home initiative already in effect at Company X demonstrates that employees are equally productive whether working on-site or remotely. The CEO at Company X therefore recommends that the company expand the current initiative to reach a target of 40 percent of all employees working remotely within 2 years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the reasoning behind expanding the current initiative at Company X?


(A) Participation in the current initiative has been completely voluntary, and employee participation has ranged from 10 percent in some divisions of the company to 50 percent in others.

(B) Eligibility for the current initiative has been restricted to the 20 percent of employees whose jobs do not require participation in regular on-site planning sessions.

(C) Employees who currently work remotely have had a significant amount of difficulty using the company's electronic network primarily because not enough employees work remotely to justify upgrading the system.

(D) Some of the employees who are able to work remotely are the very employees who, if working on site, would require costly accommodations.

(E) Many employees who choose to work remotely also support other environmentally-friendly initiatives.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cans » Fri May 27, 2011 8:14 am
IMO D
Join the discussion

by itsmebharat » Fri May 27, 2011 8:38 am
IMO C
I am not an Expert, please feel free to suggest if there is an error.
Join the discussion

by sourabh33 » Fri May 27, 2011 9:53 am
IMO B
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Fri May 27, 2011 10:49 am
My Choice C
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion

by abhishek.pati » Sat May 28, 2011 2:38 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Sat May 28, 2011 3:14 am
OA is B guys...
Join the discussion

by akshatmikku » Sat May 28, 2011 7:57 am
nice question :)
so here is my reasoning for this -
question stem analysis : employees working remotely -cost effective, environ friendly ; equally productive compared to employees on site ; CEO suggests -hey lets get 40 % of our total employees involved in this initiative within two years...
so you have to find a flaw what this plan is not going to work
a) has got nothing to do with the CEO's plan
b) if current initiative is restricted to a subset of people who do not require to be onsite in the first place so that would mean that the initiative is giving way too optimistic results and hence gives a reason not to take this initiative further .
c) has nothing to do with the CEO's plans
d) irrelevant
e) irrelevant
Join the discussion

by cans » Sun May 29, 2011 10:58 pm
@atulmangal: Can you explain how it is B?
Join the discussion

by champmag » Mon May 30, 2011 2:00 am
Good question. Was confused between B and D.

But B is better contender.
Join the discussion

by saketk » Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:31 pm
akshatmikku wrote:nice question :)
so here is my reasoning for this -
question stem analysis : employees working remotely -cost effective, environ friendly ; equally productive compared to employees on site ; CEO suggests -hey lets get 40 % of our total employees involved in this initiative within two years...
so you have to find a flaw what this plan is not going to work
a) has got nothing to do with the CEO's plan
b) if current initiative is restricted to a subset of people who do not require to be onsite in the first place so that would mean that the initiative is giving way too optimistic results and hence gives a reason not to take this initiative further .
c) has nothing to do with the CEO's plans
d) irrelevant
e) irrelevant
I will not say D is irrelevant. D has a meaning but the word 'Some' is what makes this option a weak contender. What if only 2 out 10 employee require costly accommodations? Cumulatively you may still be saving more with the other 8.
Join the discussion