Female employes in X

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:19 am
Thanked: 1 times

Female employes in X

by kobel51 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:26 am
What is the number of female employees in Company X?

(1) If Company X were to hire 14 more people and all of these people were females, the ratio of the number of male employees to the number of female employees would then be 16 to 9

(2) Company X has 105 more male employees tan female employees

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:30 am
Thanked: 335 times
Followed by:98 members

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:58 am
Hope this helps. My signature below has more info.

Image

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:14 pm
kobel51 wrote:What is the number of female employees in Company X?

(1) If Company X were to hire 14 more people and all of these people were females, the ratio of the number of male employees to the number of female employees would then be 16 to 9

(2) Company X has 105 more male employees tan female employees
Hi!

Without any doubt, the most powerful concept for data sufficiency is "number of equations vs number of unknowns". You can use that rule (and its exceptions) to solve many DS questions without doing much, if any, math.

Let's apply it to this particular question.

Step 1 of the Kaplan Method for DS: analyze the Q stem.

Here, we see "what", so we think "value question" - we need exactly 1 value for sufficiency. No hints provided at all, we're just asked to solve for a single variable.

Step 2 of the Kaplan Method for DS: evaluate the statements.

(1) we see "would be", which we know we can turn into an equals sign, so we can definitely create an equation out of this info. However, we've introduced another variable, "male employees". We have 1 equation and 2 unknowns: insufficient.

(2) "has" is another equals sign indicator, so again we can turn this into an equation. Same problem as (1): 2 variables, 1 equation... insufficient.

Since each statement alone is insufficient, we now consider them together.

Each statement provided an equation. A quick check shows that the 2 equations are distinct (i.e. different) and linear (no squares, cubes, etc...).

2 equations, 2 unknowns: sufficient! Choose (C), "together".

Here's the key takeaway for this and similar questions: DS isn't about calculation, it's about critical thinking. The better you understand the concepts that underlie GMAT math, the fewer actual math you need to do. The highest scorers get through most DS questions doing almost no calculations!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course