BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Federal law

Expert replies
by vaibhav.iit2002 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:28 am
Federal law prohibits businesses from reimbursing any employees for the cost of owning and operating a private aircraft that is used for business purposes. Thus, many American companies themselves purchase private aircraft. The vast majority of the business aviation fleet is owned by small and mid-size businesses, and flights are strictly for business purposes, with mostly mid-level employees on board. These companies and their boards of directors are in full compliance with the law and with what is best for their businesses.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the statements above?
a. The Federal law in question costs businesses money.
b. Most executives would rather fly on company owned planes than on commercial airlines.
c. Large businesses usually have their executives fly first or business class on commercial flights.
d. Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law.
e. By not receiving any reimbursement for these flights, the mid-level executives on board are complying with the law.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rajatche33 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:15 am
IMO: E
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:04 am
I cant pick between A and E, can someone help please
Join the discussion

by Ad_Astra_Per_Aspera » Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:32 am
A is incorrect because there is no evidence about the relative costs, so it does not have to be true that the law costs businesses money.

E is correct since if the companies are in full compliance with this law (the statements indicate this), it must be true that the executives following the company's guidelines also are fully complying with the law.
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:58 pm
Ad_Astra_Per_Aspera wrote:A is incorrect because there is no evidence about the relative costs, so it does not have to be true that the law costs businesses money.

E is correct since if the companies are in full compliance with this law (the statements indicate this), it must be true that the executives following the company's guidelines also are fully complying with the law.
Still its difficult to remove A i guess
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:14 pm
Ad_Astra_Per_Aspera wrote:A is incorrect because there is no evidence about the relative costs, so it does not have to be true that the law costs businesses money.

E is correct since if the companies are in full compliance with this law (the statements indicate this), it must be true that the executives following the company's guidelines also are fully complying with the law.
Relative costs are not important for answer cjoice A to be correct, because whether it costs businesses 10 dollars or a thousand dollars a month to operate a fleet of planes, this is still cost paid for by businesses. Also, if businesses could reimburse employees for usage of their private jets, it will avoid the costs associated with maintainance of the planes.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:16 pm
Provide OA please
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:48 pm
OA is E
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:03 pm
I find inference and must be true more difficult than parallel reasoning ! There many things that can be inferred.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:45 pm
I agree with you guys. I also think that the right answer is E
Join the discussion