Diatoms

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

Diatoms

by gmatmachoman » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:38 am
Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth's last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist's hypothesis?

A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.

IMO [spoiler]C Vs D[/spoiler]
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times
Followed by:2 members

by sumanr84 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:18 am
I will go with C.

C is clearly undermining the scientists hypothesis that ferrous material promoted increase in diatoms, rather it could have been due to other minerals.

D - We have no information whether Sediment contain ferrous materials or the amount of ferrous materials present in Sediments, whose increase/decrease could justify the hypothesis.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:26 am
gmatmachoman wrote:Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth's last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist's hypothesis?

Premise : Ice age atmosphere contained large numbers of ferrous material and small amount of carbon di oxide
Premise : Algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere


Conclusion : Ferrous material had promoted increase in algae population of antartica


A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.
INCORRECT : Irrelevant. Diatoms is only used as an example in the stimulus. Furthermore this answer choice does nothing to weaken the conclusion.

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.
INCORRECT : Strengthens the argument by stating that ferrous material could indeed promote the growth of oceanic algae.

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.
CORRECT : This undermines the argument by stating that there is possibility of some other cause (other minerals) for the stated effect (increase in algae population).

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.
INCORRECT : Irrelevant/ Out of Scope

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.
INCORRECT : Irrelevant. Issue is not about harm caused to algae by ferrous material.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:27 pm

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 12 times

by vijay_venky » Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:54 am
I think option D is too narrow to be considered because the stimulus just gives diatom as an example of antarctic algae, and the absence of the increase in this particular algae does not effect the conclusion.

But C says there are other minerals along with ferrous minerals which puts the hypothesis of the scientist under suspicion.