Fast cycle time

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:46 am

Fast cycle time

by muhtasimhassan » Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:09 am
"Fast cycle time" is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production. Not only does it speed up production,, but it also ensures quality. The reason is that bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.

The claim about quality made above rests on a questionable presupposition that ____

a. any flaw in work on a product would cause a bottleneck or delay and so would be prevented from occurring on a 'fast cycle' production line.

b. the strategy of 'fast cycle time' would require the fundamental rethinking of product design.

c. the primary goal of the organization is to produce a product of unexcelled quality, rather than to generate profits for stockholders.

d. 'fast cycle time' could be achieved by shaving time off each of the component processes in a production cycle.

e. 'fast cycle time' is a concept in business strategy that has not yet been put into practice in a factory.


Answer: A

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 61 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:740

by force5 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:27 am
FCT will eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production

this can only happen if FCT will prevent any flaw and hence prevent bottle neck or delay ...

Hence A

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:33 am
How to eliminate B?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:12 am
A.

B is out of scope. In the passage there is no relationship mentioned for quality and product re design.
This time no looking back!!!
Navami

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:20 am
Thanks navami,

I overlooked the option!

Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:19 am
Not quite sure about how to eliminate D. Please help.

Thanks.

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Sat Dec 17, 2011 6:10 am
mankey wrote:Not quite sure about how to eliminate D. Please help.

Thanks.
d. 'fast cycle time' could be achieved by shaving time off each of the component processes in a production cycle.

Argument is concerned about HOW THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS IS IMPROVED IN FAST CYCLE TIME PROCESSES. Argument is NOT concerned about HOW EXACTLY ONE COULD ACHIEVE FAST CYCLE TIME PROCESSES

Moreover, we can't say for sure from the given argument that 'fast cycle time' could be achieved by shaving time off each component. There could be many other ways, for example, we can make some design change so that use of a part of the component is NOT required.

Drop D

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
Location: Vietnam
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:5 members

by tuanquang269 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:27 am
Premise 1: Not only does it speed up production,, but it also ensures quality.

Premise 2: The reason is that bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.

Conclusion: "Fast cycle time" is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production

Negate A:

a. any flaw in work on a product would NOT cause a bottleneck or delay and so would NOT be prevented from occurring on a 'fast cycle' production line. => The bottleneck and delay cannot be eliminated. Weaken the conclusion.


Negate B

b. the strategy of 'fast cycle time' would NOT require the fundamental rethinking of product design. => not affect anything to the argument.