BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city’s

Expert replies
by RBBmba@2014 » Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:20 am
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city's mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization


OA: A

@ Experts - I got this one right. But a quick clarification is reqd.

In A, amount allocated [IN] the previous year - isn't the MISSING PREPOSITION IN making this sentence BIT awkward ? Although this option stands out to be the BEST as others have major issues/errors.

Please shed some light on this aspect...Much thanks in advance!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:40 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:amount allocated [IN] the previous year - isn't the MISSING PREPOSITION IN making this sentence BIT awkward ? Although this option stands out to be the BEST as others have major issues/errors.

Please shed some light on this aspect...Much thanks in advance!
A preposition is NOT missing in the OA.
No preposition is warranted.

All of the following are correct:
the amount allocated THIS YEAR
the amount allocated LAST YEAR
the amount allocated THE PREVIOUS YEAR


the amount allocated THIS WEEK
the amount allocated LAST WEEK
the amount allocated THE PREVIOUS WEEK

the amount allocated TODAY
the amount allocated YESTERDAY
the amount allocated TUESDAY
the amount allocated THE PREVIOUS DAY
.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by RBBmba@2014 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 7:49 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: A preposition is NOT missing in the OA.
No preposition is warranted.

All of the following are correct:
the amount allocated THIS YEAR
the amount allocated LAST YEAR
the amount allocated THE PREVIOUS YEAR
So, will it be GRAMMATICALLY wrong to use a preposition here - the amount allocated [IN] THIS YEAR ? (or it's just OPTIONAL to use a preposition in such usage ?)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:23 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote: A preposition is NOT missing in the OA.
No preposition is warranted.

All of the following are correct:
the amount allocated THIS YEAR
the amount allocated LAST YEAR
the amount allocated THE PREVIOUS YEAR
So, will it be GRAMMATICALLY wrong to use a preposition here - the amount allocated [IN] THIS YEAR ? (or it's just OPTIONAL to use a preposition in such usage ?)
Generally, it is unidiomatic to precede this year, last year, or the previous year with in.
SC94 in the OG13 offers another supporting example:
Heating oil prices are higher this year.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by kutlee » Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:10 am
other than change in meaning does C have any other error?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jun 19, 2015 6:59 am
kutlee wrote:other than change in meaning does C have any other error?
Errors in C:

the amount from the previous year
This meaning is nonsensical.
An amount cannot be taken FROM a year.

the previous year that was allocated
Here, that was allocated seems to modify year, implying that THE PREVIOUS YEAR was allocated.
Not the intended meaning.

Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city's mayor proposed...to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
This meaning is nonsensical, implying that the mayor proposed to CLOSE THE BUDGET GAP by GIVING MONEY to hundreds of local arts groups.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1