As per the rules of grammar, answer D is perfectly okay.
the pronoun it in answer D has one and only one logical antecedent, and that is honey. Just try to swap all other possible antecedents for it, the sentence would just not make sense.
Half Argentina can't go to US ( maybe half Argentina's population but not Argentina itself!)
neither half exporter can go to the US.
So we are left with only 1 noun -honey.
On the other hand, E is very vague; it does not specify half of what. We always say expressions such as these :
half a slice of bread, half a glass of water, half the number of cars, half the money, and etc. We never say half and the leave the listener of the sentence guessing.
Also going.... in the E choice is a participle phrase ( adjective) that is modifying half. So as the sentence states, it means that half itself went to the US and not 50% of the honey!, resulting in a ridiculous meaning.
Just read MGMAT's pronouns chapter. It clearly states that we can have a multiple nouns in a sentence and still use pronouns so long as the antecedent is a logical one.
exporter of honey
- rishab1988
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:50 pm
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:7 members
- GMAT Score:720
Last edited by rishab1988 on Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:02 am, edited 2 times in total.
Finally aced the GMAT.
720 (Q49 V40)
720 (Q49 V40)
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
- giovanni.gastone
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:35 pm
- Location: Florence, Italy
So, is your answer D? I agree with your rationale and I also picked D, but it seems like most people believe that the answer is E here.rishab1988 wrote:As per the rules of grammar, answer D is perfectly okay.
the pronoun it in answer D has one and only one logical antecedent, and that is honey. Just try to swap all other possible antecedents for it, the sentence would just not make sense.
Half Argentina can't go to US ( maybe half Argentina's population but not Argentina itself!)
neither half exporter can go to the US.
So we are left with only 1 noun -honey.
On the other hand, E is very vague; it does not specify half of what. We always say expressions such as these :
half a slice of bread, half a glass of water, half the number of cars, half the money, and etc. We never say half and the leave the listener of the sentence guessing.
Also going.... in the E choice is a participle phrase ( adjective) that is modifying half. So as the sentence states, it means that half itself went to the US and not 50% of the honey!, resulting in a ridiculous meaning.
Just read MGMAT's pronouns chapter. It clearly states that we can have a multiple nouns in a sentence and still use pronouns so long as the antecedent is a logical one.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:27 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:54 am
- Followed by:1 members
Can someoe please explain in the correct option (E) what is "with" modifier modifying actually?rohittk wrote:Please can someone identify the correct option with explanations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q15:
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world�s leading exporter of honey,
with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going to theUnited States.
A. with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going
B. with the sale of nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it
that goes
C. with the sale to foreign markets of nearly 90,000 tons a year, with almost half of it
going
D. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it goes
E. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going
- bubbliiiiiiii
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
- Location: Hyderabad, India
- Thanked: 49 times
- Followed by:12 members
- GMAT Score:700
Here's some information on proper usage of with posted by Stacey.CaptainM wrote:Can someoe please explain in the correct option (E) what is "with" modifier modifying actually?rohittk wrote:Please can someone identify the correct option with explanations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q15:
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world�s leading exporter of honey,
with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going to theUnited States.
A. with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going
B. with the sale of nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it
that goes
C. with the sale to foreign markets of nearly 90,000 tons a year, with almost half of it
going
D. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it goes
E. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going
https://www.beatthegmat.com/proper-usage ... 45771.html
IMO E.
Experts please help clear the air.
Regards,
Pranay
Pranay
GMAT/MBA Expert
- e-GMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: US
- Thanked: 527 times
- Followed by:227 members
"with" modifiers are very versatile modifiers. They can modify either the preceding clause or the preceding nouns. What they modify actually depends on the context of the sentence and the wording of the modifier itself.
This is the sentence with choice E
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world's leading exporter of honey,
selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going to the United States.
The highlighted modifier above modifies the action of the preceding clause. In essence this sentence can be written as two separate sentences:
1. In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world's leading exporter of honey, selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets.
2. Almost half of the exports go to US.
So sentence 2 has been converted into with modifier. This modifier extends the thought of the preceding clause by providing a detail supporting it.
You may find discussion of "with modifiers" pertaining to 2 official sentences at this link:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/comma-with-e ... tml#376889
Thanks,
Payal
This is the sentence with choice E
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world's leading exporter of honey,
selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going to the United States.
The highlighted modifier above modifies the action of the preceding clause. In essence this sentence can be written as two separate sentences:
1. In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world's leading exporter of honey, selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets.
2. Almost half of the exports go to US.
So sentence 2 has been converted into with modifier. This modifier extends the thought of the preceding clause by providing a detail supporting it.
You may find discussion of "with modifiers" pertaining to 2 official sentences at this link:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/comma-with-e ... tml#376889
Thanks,
Payal
Register for free live sessions
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
- Bek
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:29 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world's leading exporter of honey, selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half of it going to the United States.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/05/busin ... honey.html
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/05/busin ... honey.html
- arghya05
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:38 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
but why cant answer be c, how to make a distinction between a with or a ing modifier,i guess both modifier performs similar function(both adverbial)
this sentence is worng
ron has also said sentence.................... , ing modifier.................. , ing modifier
this sentence is worng
ron has also said sentence.................... , ing modifier.................. , ing modifier
Hi Ron,rohittk wrote:Please can someone identify the correct option with explanations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q15:
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world�s leading exporter of honey,
with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going to theUnited States.
A. with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going
B. with the sale of nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it
that goes
C. with the sale to foreign markets of nearly 90,000 tons a year, with almost half of it
going
D. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it goes
E. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going
Could you take a look at this problem?
I'm not sure about the precise usage of "with sth doing", for the " sell 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets" part, can both "with sth doing" and "comma +Ving" be right in meaning? if not, what's the meaning if we use them respectively?
about the second part "half of the exported honey",
firstly, could "it" or "them" be used to mean "90,000 tons a year"?
secondly,I found in many other SC problems that if there are 2 plural nouns in a short clause , the plural pronoun after them must be tested for ambiguity and it's 100% in the wrong answers.
Therefore, I guess, here the choice E is trying to avoid using plural pronoun as there are 2 plural nouns before(tons, markets), am I right?
I'm just not sure wheter the "almost half" can act as a pronoun, and it does't arouse ambiguity,can/does it?
Thank you very much!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
is this problem taken directly from OG, OG supplement, or GMAT PREP software?Kajiabeat wrote:Hi Ron,rohittk wrote:Please can someone identify the correct option with explanations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q15:
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world�s leading exporter of honey,
with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going to theUnited States.
A. with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going
B. with the sale of nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it
that goes
C. with the sale to foreign markets of nearly 90,000 tons a year, with almost half of it
going
D. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it goes
E. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going
Could you take a look at this problem?
I'm not sure about the precise usage of "with sth doing", for the " sell 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets" part, can both "with sth doing" and "comma +Ving" be right in meaning? if not, what's the meaning if we use them respectively?
about the second part "half of the exported honey",
firstly, could "it" or "them" be used to mean "90,000 tons a year"?
secondly,I found in many other SC problems that if there are 2 plural nouns in a short clause , the plural pronoun after them must be tested for ambiguity and it's 100% in the wrong answers.
Therefore, I guess, here the choice E is trying to avoid using plural pronoun as there are 2 plural nouns before(tons, markets), am I right?
I'm just not sure wheter the "almost half" can act as a pronoun, and it does't arouse ambiguity,can/does it?
Thank you very much!
if not, i would withhold judgment about the "with + noun + verb-ing" construction; that is a construction that is accepted by some authorities but rejected by others. if it has not been judged either way in one of those three official sources, then it's impossible to give a definitive opinion about this problem.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
Hi Ron,lunarpower wrote:is this problem taken directly from OG, OG supplement, or GMAT PREP software?Kajiabeat wrote:Hi Ron,rohittk wrote:Please can someone identify the correct option with explanations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q15:
In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world�s leading exporter of honey,
with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going to theUnited States.
A. with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going
B. with the sale of nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it
that goes
C. with the sale to foreign markets of nearly 90,000 tons a year, with almost half of it
going
D. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it goes
E. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going
Could you take a look at this problem?
I'm not sure about the precise usage of "with sth doing", for the " sell 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets" part, can both "with sth doing" and "comma +Ving" be right in meaning? if not, what's the meaning if we use them respectively?
about the second part "half of the exported honey",
firstly, could "it" or "them" be used to mean "90,000 tons a year"?
secondly,I found in many other SC problems that if there are 2 plural nouns in a short clause , the plural pronoun after them must be tested for ambiguity and it's 100% in the wrong answers.
Therefore, I guess, here the choice E is trying to avoid using plural pronoun as there are 2 plural nouns before(tons, markets), am I right?
I'm just not sure wheter the "almost half" can act as a pronoun, and it does't arouse ambiguity,can/does it?
Thank you very much!
if not, i would withhold judgment about the "with + noun + verb-ing" construction; that is a construction that is accepted by some authorities but rejected by others. if it has not been judged either way in one of those three official sources, then it's impossible to give a definitive opinion about this problem.
when reviewing other SC problems, I saw another one which has "with + N + doing" in it.
Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.
A. Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people
B. As the cost of wireless service plummeted in the last year and as mobile phones became increasingly common, many people
C. In the last year, with the cost of wireless service plummeting, and mobile phones have become increasingly common, there are many people
D. With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are
E. While the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year and mobile phones are increasingly common, many people are
the SC problem from this thread, well, sorry but I don't know the source...
P.S. I also found the orignal passage in NYtimes.
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/05/busin ... honey.html
I'm just wondering whether such kind of phrase as "820,000 square meters", "9000 tons" can be the precedent of "it".
Please help~thank you very much!
Well, In choice between D&E, there are a lot of argues here in this question.
While E seems little bit odd and looks little bit unclear because the choice omits object after "half", the usage of "and" in choice D is clearly inferior than "with" usage in my opinion.
And, guyz! this "with" phrase in choice #E is hanging selling participle and the participle is talking about honey. So, this omit seems possibly (even not preferred) be admitted comparing other flaws in other options.
Just my opinion. LOL
While E seems little bit odd and looks little bit unclear because the choice omits object after "half", the usage of "and" in choice D is clearly inferior than "with" usage in my opinion.
And, guyz! this "with" phrase in choice #E is hanging selling participle and the participle is talking about honey. So, this omit seems possibly (even not preferred) be admitted comparing other flaws in other options.
Just my opinion. LOL