BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Exponents of prime p in n!

Expert replies
by kartikshah » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:10 am
Question 01

The exponent of 7 in 100C50 is:
(a) 0
(b) 2
(c) 4
(d) 6
(e) None of these

Source: www.gmatscore.com
OA is A

My question -- if the question had been modified and exponents of 2 had to be found in 100C50 then would the answer be 3?
I worked it out as under:
2s in 100! = 97
2s in 50! = 47

So 97 - (2)(47) = 97-94 = 3

Question 02

The number of positive integers n such that 2n divides n! is
(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4

OA is A BUT I did not understand the explantion provided by www.gmatscore.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by eagleeye » Fri Jul 27, 2012 8:32 am
kartikshah wrote:Question 01

My question -- if the question had been modified and exponents of 2 had to be found in 100C50 then would the answer be 3?
I worked it out as under:
2s in 100! = 97
2s in 50! = 47

So 97 - (2)(47) = 97-94 = 3
Yes. the answer is 3. You have done it correctly. Good Job!

Question 02
kartikshah wrote: The number of positive integers n such that 2n divides n! is
(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4

OA is A BUT I did not understand the explantion provided by www.gmatscore.com
.

OA as A is incorrect. The correct answer is infinite number.

Here's my explanation:

Just start from the smallest option and check.
for n=1,2,3,4,5
n! 2*n
1! < 2*1
2! < 2*2
3! = 3*2 (equal, 6 divides 6
4! > 4*2 (4 and 2 are factors of 4!, 8 divides 24)
5! > 5*2 (5 and 2 are factors of 5!, 10 divides 120)
etc.

We can see that at first n! is less than 2n, then for n=3, it becomes equal to 2n. And for higher values, it outstrips 2n by larger and larger margins, and 2n will always divide n! . We need not check any further. And we see that infinite values of n satisfy.

The question would have been better written if it said "The number of positive integers n such that n! divides 2n" in which case answer would be only one value, making B the correct choice.

Let me know if this helps :)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jul 27, 2012 10:58 am
kartikshah wrote:
The number of positive integers n such that 2n divides n! is
(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4

OA is A BUT I did not understand the explantion provided by www.gmatscore.com
I suspect that the portion in red should read as follows:
The number of positive integers n such that 2^n divides n! is

(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4
Let n=100.
Then n! = 100!
For the purposes of this problem, 2^n = the number of 2's that can be divided into 100!.
Count how many times EACH POWER OF 2 can be divided into 100!:

100/2¹ = 50.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 50 multiples of 2¹.

100/2² = 100/4 = 25.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 25 multiples of 2².

100/2³ = 100/8 = 12.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 12 multiples of 2³.

100/2� = 100/16 = 6.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 6 multiples of 2�.

100/2� = 100/32 = 3.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 3 multiples of 2�.

100/2� = 100/64 = 1.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 1 multiple of 2�.

Thus, 100! includes:
50 multiples of 2
25 multiples of 2²
12 multiples of 2³
6 multiples of 2�
3 multiples of 2�
1 multiple of 2�

Thus, the total number of 2's that can be divided into 100! = 50+25+12+6+3+1 = 97.
Since 2^100 is composed of 100 2's, 2^100 does not divide 100!.

The example above illustrates that there will always be more factors of 2 in 2^n than there are in n!.
Thus, there are no integers n such that 2^n divides n!.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by kartikshah » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:51 pm
True!
It would make more sense if the question said 2^n.
Thanks for clarifying!
Join the discussion