BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Exponents of prime p in n!

Expert replies
by kartikshah » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:10 am
Question 01

The exponent of 7 in 100C50 is:
(a) 0
(b) 2
(c) 4
(d) 6
(e) None of these

Source: www.gmatscore.com
OA is A

My question -- if the question had been modified and exponents of 2 had to be found in 100C50 then would the answer be 3?
I worked it out as under:
2s in 100! = 97
2s in 50! = 47

So 97 - (2)(47) = 97-94 = 3

Question 02

The number of positive integers n such that 2n divides n! is
(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4

OA is A BUT I did not understand the explantion provided by www.gmatscore.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by eagleeye » Fri Jul 27, 2012 8:32 am
kartikshah wrote:Question 01

My question -- if the question had been modified and exponents of 2 had to be found in 100C50 then would the answer be 3?
I worked it out as under:
2s in 100! = 97
2s in 50! = 47

So 97 - (2)(47) = 97-94 = 3
Yes. the answer is 3. You have done it correctly. Good Job!

Question 02
kartikshah wrote: The number of positive integers n such that 2n divides n! is
(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4

OA is A BUT I did not understand the explantion provided by www.gmatscore.com
.

OA as A is incorrect. The correct answer is infinite number.

Here's my explanation:

Just start from the smallest option and check.
for n=1,2,3,4,5
n! 2*n
1! < 2*1
2! < 2*2
3! = 3*2 (equal, 6 divides 6
4! > 4*2 (4 and 2 are factors of 4!, 8 divides 24)
5! > 5*2 (5 and 2 are factors of 5!, 10 divides 120)
etc.

We can see that at first n! is less than 2n, then for n=3, it becomes equal to 2n. And for higher values, it outstrips 2n by larger and larger margins, and 2n will always divide n! . We need not check any further. And we see that infinite values of n satisfy.

The question would have been better written if it said "The number of positive integers n such that n! divides 2n" in which case answer would be only one value, making B the correct choice.

Let me know if this helps :)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jul 27, 2012 10:58 am
kartikshah wrote:
The number of positive integers n such that 2n divides n! is
(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4

OA is A BUT I did not understand the explantion provided by www.gmatscore.com
I suspect that the portion in red should read as follows:
The number of positive integers n such that 2^n divides n! is

(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) 2
(d) 3
(e) 4
Let n=100.
Then n! = 100!
For the purposes of this problem, 2^n = the number of 2's that can be divided into 100!.
Count how many times EACH POWER OF 2 can be divided into 100!:

100/2¹ = 50.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 50 multiples of 2¹.

100/2² = 100/4 = 25.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 25 multiples of 2².

100/2³ = 100/8 = 12.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 12 multiples of 2³.

100/2� = 100/16 = 6.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 6 multiples of 2�.

100/2� = 100/32 = 3.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 3 multiples of 2�.

100/2� = 100/64 = 1.
The calculation above indicates that 100! includes 1 multiple of 2�.

Thus, 100! includes:
50 multiples of 2
25 multiples of 2²
12 multiples of 2³
6 multiples of 2�
3 multiples of 2�
1 multiple of 2�

Thus, the total number of 2's that can be divided into 100! = 50+25+12+6+3+1 = 97.
Since 2^100 is composed of 100 2's, 2^100 does not divide 100!.

The example above illustrates that there will always be more factors of 2 in 2^n than there are in n!.
Thus, there are no integers n such that 2^n divides n!.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by kartikshah » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:51 pm
True!
It would make more sense if the question said 2^n.
Thanks for clarifying!
Join the discussion